MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389309447 · doi:10.1097/cnj.0000000000001145

Choosing Who Writes Your Story

2023· article· en· W4389309447 sur OpenAlexaff
Christy Secor

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Christian Nursing · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueResilience and Mental Health
Établissements canadiensFuture Earth
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFacilitatorCourageShameVulnerability (computing)Power (physics)Resilience (materials science)PsychologyCertificationPsychoanalysisSociologySocial psychologyPolitical scienceLawComputer scienceComputer security

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

FigureIt is a new year ... a time for establishing resolutions and considering how to address the challenges and difficulties we face. In 2023, top New Year's resolutions included improving mental health, boosting fitness levels, losing weight, bettering our diet, and improving finances (Davis, 2023). Although these represent excellent goals, there is often one major obstacle standing in the way of our finding success: the person we see each day in the mirror. Let me explain. I consider myself an expert at getting my own way. I believe I can accomplish much more in a day than is humanly possible. I become discouraged when I do not see results in what I define as a timely manner. I find myself distracted by all that needs to be accomplished within a day and begin to act in a way many would describe as responding more to the “tyranny of the urgent.” I can become caught up with all the “good” opportunities that cross my path, leaving me exhausted physically, emotionally, and spiritually. And, if I am being completely honest, I also have tended to resist areas of growth in my life because of the pain, failure, and difficulty that often accompany areas needing change. Maybe you experience similar barriers in your personal or professional life. As a child, I was taught I could grow up to be whatever I wanted to be if I worked hard enough. All I needed was the determination and grit to succeed. This is how many of us survived our undergraduate and graduate nursing education programs. We passed state licensure and certification exams. We sacrificed our sleep, health, time, and family. We questioned our choices and our value. But we pressed on. We simply needed to get this “thing” behind us. We told ourselves it would get better. Even though I was a believer in Jesus, I forgot my identity in Christ. I forgot my source of strength. I looked for ways to numb the pain and the difficulties I experienced. I became angry at God and questioned his presence in my life. Relationships became strained. I felt alone and isolated as I tried to rewrite my story by controlling who and what I could around me. This is where God in his incredible love continues to amaze me. God never turned his back on me. He continued to pursue me. He allowed me to experience the consequences of my choices, but he did not leave me alone on that journey. Like the shepherd who left the 99 sheep to go after the one that had wandered (Luke 15:1-7), I was found. And as I continue to follow God in the events of life and the challenges and mistakes I make, I continue to learn how to trust. What has changed? It is the author of my story. It is knowing I cannot trust in myself, but I can trust the one who made me. I hear God say, “I am the author of restoration. Let me write your story.” In him, I am whole. I am a new creation; the old has gone, the new has come (2 Corinthians 5:17). In him, I can grow and move through the pain, challenges, and difficulties of life. In him, I know acceptance, love, worth, and value. In him, I have purpose. You will see two new columns debuting in this issue. One column addresses the growing mental health challenges we face, and the second column focuses on the way God uses us missionally to share who he is with those in our communities and around the world. This issue also addresses disparities within our profession including diversity, equity, and inclusion within nursing education; the perception of nursing students toward the homeless; burnout; and moral distress among staff and novice nurses. Along with practical steps to take, you will gain important spiritual applications for nurses and the communities where we serve. You can experience renewed hope as you use the Psalms to deepen and enrich your prayer life. This is an excellent way to start a new year—recognizing our need and dependence in God for all we face.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,790
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,370

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,046
Tête enseignante GPT0,430
Écart entre enseignants0,384 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Christian NursingMême sujetResilience and Mental HealthTravaux en français237 207