MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389311996 · doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2023.11.020

Multimodal Imaging of a Rare Intracardiac Mesothelial Cyst

2023· article· en· W4389311996 sur OpenAlexaff
Maude Rancourt, Asher Frydman, Mohammed Tarabzoni, Vijay Gupta, Maged Elrayes, Satoru Fujii, Aashish Goela, Michael Chu

Notice bibliographique

RevueCJC Open · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiac tumors and thrombi
Établissements canadiensWestern University
Organismes subventionnairesMedtronic
Mots-clésIntracardiac injectionMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingRadiologySurgical resectionComputed tomographyMediastinal massCardiac magnetic resonanceSurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Intracardiac tumours require extensive imaging to characterize, prognosticate, and guide timing and approach of surgical resection. We describe the case of a 48-year-old morbidly obese (BMI 64) female who, upon preoperative investigations for bariatric surgery, had an incidental finding of a 7 cm middle mediastinal mass. Computed tomography suggested the origin was extra-cardiac; however, echocardiography suggested it was within the ventricular cavity. Magnetic resonance imaging was not possible because of bore size limitations. This case highlights clinical decision-making challenges in the management of cardiac tumours without tissue diagnosis and the critical role of multimodal imaging to guide surgical intervention. We present the case of a 48-year-old morbidly obese female (BMI 64) who underwent preoperative investigations for bariatric surgery and had an incidental finding of a 7 cm mass in the middle mediastinum. She was minimally symptomatic with occasional episodes of pre-syncope and mild dyspnea, which was attributed to her morbid obesity and sedentary status. Her relevant past medical history consisted of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obstructive sleep apnea requiring continuous positive airway pressure. In general, she had otherwise been well, awaiting her bariatric surgery, without any fatigue or constitutional symptoms. Two years prior, the patient had a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) performed for a presyncopal episode which demonstrated normal biventricular function and normal valvular function without any evidence of a mass. The initial computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a 7 cm middle mediastinal mass that was believed to originate from the pericardium. An ECG-gated cardiac CT with intravenous contrast (Figure 1A, B, and C ) was performed to improve tissue contrast and minimize motion artifact to better elucidate the mass. This suggested that it was a well circumscribed cystic mass (mean 30 Hounsfield units) pushing into the right ventricle (RV) from the middle mediastinum, compatible with a pericardial or duplication cyst. In order to further characterize the lesion—detail its exact location, size, appearance, relationship to adjacent structures, and risk of malignancy—various other imaging modalities were employed. A TTE provided temporal resolution to determine the impact on cardiac structures and function. This demonstrated a dilated RV with normal function, trace tricuspid insufficiency and also suggested that the mass was extra-cardiac in origin, causing severe RV compression. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was utilized to provide further anatomic clarity, which revealed severe RV luminal loss but raised the possibility that the tumour had eroded into or through the RV free wall (Figure 1D). At this point, we believed that there was a high likelihood that the tumour was benign and considered whether or not bariatric surgery should just proceed ahead as the tumour did not appear to be causing any hemodynamic compromise. However, with the remote chance of a more ominous etiology, we sought further imaging guidance. A magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was attempted for further tumour characterization, as this modality has the best spatial resolution for tissue. However, this was unsuccessful because of MR bore size limitations. We then pursued 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) to determine the risk of malignancy, which identified a well-defined cystic/proteinaceous tumour intimate to the pericardium, protruding into the body of the RV with moderate peripheral FDG uptake, favored to be in the adjacent RV, consistent with a benign etiology. Cardiac catheterization demonstrated normal coronary arteries without any tumour feeder vessels. Clinical discussions focused on balancing the increased perioperative risks secondary to her morbid obesity and likely benign etiology of this tumour with the patient’s strong desire for surgical resection. We initially contemplated a robotic assisted pericardial cyst resection to reduce the perioperative impact on the patient; however, CT imaging suggested that this would be very difficult with her body habitus. More importantly, with further imaging suggesting that the tumour had invaded through the RV free wall, we felt that it was more appropriate to attempt resection through a midline sternotomy. At operation, we found that the pericardium was moving independently from the heart and that, surprisingly, the tumour was completely encapsulated within the RV. As such, the patient was heparinized, placed on full cardiopulmonary bypass and underwent cardioplegic arrest. The anterior RV was incised and the cystic tumour was meticulously excised with sharp dissection and enucleated out of the RV free wall without rupture (Figure 2; Video 1). It had the macroscopic appearance of a cystic mass. The large mass (Figure 2C) was sent for pathological analysis and frozen section specimens of the adjacent RV free wall were negative for malignancy. Following resection, we noticed that a papillary muscle supporting the tricuspid valve was displaced and near rupture. It was translocated and reinforced with pledgeted braided sutures to the base of the right ventricle. The right ventricular defect was then closed with a large bovine pericardial patch and felt. The patient had an unremarkable postoperative course and was discharged six days after surgery. Her postoperative echocardiogram demonstrated a left ventricular ejection fraction of 55-60%, mild-moderately reduced right ventricular function and mild-moderate tricuspid regurgitation. Final pathology revealed that the tumour was an intracardiac mesothelial cyst, with no features of malignancy and with immunophenotype confirming pericardial origin. Cardiovascular imaging has a central role in the diagnosis and management of cardiac tumours. The current literature suggests that various imaging modalities should be used to further define these rare tumours, including contrast echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography, PET, CT and MRI.1Tyebally S. Chen D. Bhattacharyya S. et al.Cardiac Tumors: JACC CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review.JACC CardioOncology. 2020; 2: 293-311Crossref PubMed Scopus (146) Google Scholar This case highlights important imaging challenges and limitations in characterizing cardiac tumours, and particularly in this case, clarifying the extra-cardiac vs. intra-cardiac origin. The potential for the mass to be intra-cardiac and the fact that no mass was identified two years prior raised concern for a malignant etiology. Assessing the malignancy risk is essential to offer appropriate treatment and avoid any delays. Malignant cardiac masses should be considered for induction therapy with chemotherapy and radiation followed by surgical resection; however, unlike most other cancers, histological tissue diagnosis is rarely confirmed before surgical resection. In this case, we suspected a benign etiology given its cystic features and middle mediastinal presentation; however, the potential RV invasion was concerning. Ultimately, the mass was found to be a mesothelial cyst—a rare, benign serosal neoplasm typically originating in the peritoneum, but occasionally from the pericardium. Reviewing recent literature revealed one report of an intramyocardial mesothelial inclusion cyst found in the left ventricle, although it was not pericardial in origin.2Alwis S. Salmasi M.Y. Raja S.G. A rare case of an intramyocardial mesothelial inclusion cyst.Clinical Case Reports. 2021; 9e05024Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar Another case involved a mesothelial cyst that was obstructing the RV outflow tract; however, this also did not originate from the pericardium.3Kotha V.K. Yan A.T. Prabhudesai V. et al.Benign intramyocardial mesothelial cyst in the right ventricular outflow tract: computed tomography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging appearances.Circulation. 2014; 130: e275-e277Crossref PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar Lastly, assessing the symptomatology and hemodynamic impact of the mass are necessary to evaluate whether resection is necessary. In conclusion, this case highlights challenges in the management of atypically presenting cardiac tumours. It also demonstrates the crucial role of multimodal imaging to guide management and its limitations when the tumour is in an unusual location or when the patient is morbidly obese. In this case, the patient underwent successful surgical resection for an extremely rare mesothelial intracardiac cyst of pericardial origin. 1.Multimodality imaging consisting of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, CT, PET, and MRI is required to characterize cardiac masses and provide adequate information for management decisions and surgical planning.2.Histologic determination of cardiac masses is often impossible prior to surgical excision.3.Mesothelial cysts are a rare form of benign neoplasm emerging from serosal tissue. Pericardial mesothelial cysts are particularly rare.4.Benign cardiac masses may require surgical management if they cause symptoms or impact hemodynamics. The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,520
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,376

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,312
Écart entre enseignants0,297 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCJC OpenMême sujetCardiac tumors and thrombiTravaux en français237 207