MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389548060 · doi:10.1353/lag.2023.a909099

Testimonio: Canadian Mining and the Aftermaths of Genocide in Guatemala ed. by Catherine Nolin and Grahame Russell (review)

2023· article· en· W4389548060 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vaclav Masek

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Latin American geography · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueMining and Resource Management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGenocideIndigenousImpunityHistoryHuman rightsDemocracyColonialismDictatorshipContext (archaeology)Political scienceLawArchaeologyPolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Testimonio: Canadian Mining and the Aftermaths of Genocide in Guatemala ed. by Catherine Nolin and Grahame Russell Vaclav Masek Catherine Nolin and Grahame Russell (Eds.) Testimonio: Canadian Mining and the Aftermaths of Genocide in Guatemala. Toronto: Behind the Lines Books, 2021. xxxi + 268 pages. Illustrations, index. $24.99 paperback (ISBN: 978-17-71-13562-7); $28.99 e-book (ISBN: 978-1-683-40329-6); $28.50 e-book (978-17-71-13563-4). In the 2013 documentary film Gold Fever, an audiovisual registry of environmental harms, human rights violations, and repression caused by Goldcorp Inc.'s mining operation in the western highlands of Guatemala, Noam Chomsky says, "You cannot say the mining companies are responsible for General Efraín Ríos Montt's slaughter but they are benefiting from the structures that were left in place after those many years of savagery and violence and repression" (Haines & Haines, 2013, minute 14:30). For Indigenous peoples in Guatemala, contemporary mining practices are experienced within a lingering legacy of colonialism and genocide (see Lovell & Lutz, 1996; Solano, 2005). Testimonio narrates the history of mining in Guatemala—one of emblematic impunity—and raises the voices and stories of the resilience of Indigenous communities who are dialectically defined by the history of injustices they have faced, even after transitioning from a military dictatorship to a multicultural democracy. The postwar context shaped many aspects of the current Guatemalan anti-mining movement. The Peace Accords of 1996 allowed activism to proliferate, but, as the book shows, the legacies of genocides remain latent. Testimonio is made up of contributions from independent journalists, media practitioners, and community leaders engaged in a collective sharing of usually complex and violent events concerning the four main mining-resistance struggles in Guatemala: Goldcorp Inc.'s Marlin mine in the Western Highlands of Sipakapa; Tahoe Resources' Escobal mine in eastern Guatemala; HudBay Mineral's Fénix mining project in the Guatemalan Caribbean; and Radius Gold/Kappes, Cassiday & Associates' El Tambor mining site in La Puya. The broad geographical reach of the comparative case studies makes Testimonio foundational and critical reading for the study of democracy and development in Guatemala. In the wake of the ever-expanding multinational extractive practices in ancestral territories, Indigenous authorities across the country are mobilizing to defend their communities and livelihoods. Testimonio is proof that by reclaiming the community as a socio-environmental nexus, the anti-mining movement is asking for a redistribution of political power, mainly in relation to ethnic and class inequalities that have [End Page 255] organized Guatemalan society for decades (Martínez-Peláez, 2009; Velásquez Nimatuj, 2019). Grassroots environmental movements, linked by solidarity networks that bridge anti-mining struggles, also demand more inclusive practices within political-administrative governance structures provided by the institutions of a more open civil society. The preface explains the accusation of defamatory content and unsubstantiated material by the previous publisher, Springer-Nature, which unilaterally canceled the book contract despite the truthful information about serious issues and the fact-based analysis of each piece included in the volume. The book then presents a compelling argument. Environmental damage is being foisted onto Guatemala by Canadian mining companies, juggernauts of exploitation, triggering inter-generational harm. Testimonio's intended audience is citizens in the Global North, primarily Canadians. As insurgent research (Gaudry, 2011), Testimonio creates accountability: The interlocking themes of globalization and capitalism raise awareness that the Canadian government supports an economic development model based on extractive practices while turning a blind eye or openly denying any wrongdoing by corporations. The volume powerfully asserts that Canadian corporations knowingly work under these conditions with an undemocratic ally. Thematically, the illustration of a local-global partnership of elites governing these extractive projects' planning, construction, and enactment underlines the contested morality of so-called partnerships in relations between Indigenous communities and mining companies. When victims and survivors speak about their suffering and losses, they rely on their interlocutors to respond: Testimony demands acknowledgment and redress. Canadian mining must follow a "transnational understanding" and "recognize the need to turn around and face the connections with Guatemala's genocidal past and violent present" (p. 7). The volume posits an underlying critique of extractive development...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,263
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,750

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,200
Écart entre enseignants0,195 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Latin American geographyMême sujetMining and Resource ManagementTravaux en français237 207