MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389675616 · doi:10.1353/nin.2023.a914860

Spitter: Baseball’s Notorious Gaylord Perry by David Vaught (review)

2023· article· en· W4389675616 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mark Armour

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArt historyArtHistoryPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Spitter: Baseball's Notorious Gaylord Perry by David Vaught Mark Armour David Vaught. Spitter: Baseball's Notorious Gaylord Perry. College Station: Texas A&M Press, 2023. 457 pp. Cloth, $38.00. Gaylord Perry was one of the best pitchers of the 1960s and 1970s, an extraordinarily durable hurler whose statistics (690 starts, 303 complete games, 314 wins, 53 shutouts) seem impossible to a modern fan. He was most famous, then and now, as the foremost practitioner of the "spitball" in the century after the pitch became illegal in 1920. To stay ahead of rule makers, umpires, and opponents, Perry spent most of his career devising, and then constantly improving, a detailed series of movements on the mound while preparing to deliver the baseball. When he pitched, he became his very own game within the game, as tens of thousands of observers, most importantly the batter, tried [End Page 134] to figure out if the upcoming pitch would be dry or wet, a choice that would have a profound effect on how it would travel. In his fascinating new book, David Vaught properly places the spitball—a word used to describe a pitched ball that has been lubricated, not necessarily with saliva—at the center of the baseball story. It is the pitch that made a struggling pitcher a star, that put the star at odds with the baseball establishment for many years, and that kept him in the game well beyond a pitcher's usual duration. While it is certainly possible that Perry could have had a career without the pitch, it seems unlikely, and at any rate he would have been less effective and less interesting. Perry grew up in or around Williamston, North Carolina, part of a tight-knit community of hard-working tenant farmers who lived at the mercy of the weather and the cyclical prices of their crops, mainly tobacco. Jim Perry, Gaylord's older brother by three years, enjoyed his own seventeen-year big league pitching career, but once he got into baseball generally left farming and his native region behind. Gaylord remained tied to his homeland and worked on farms, for better or worse, every off-season and after his career was over. The two Perry brothers were always linked as ballplayers, but they were never close, and they were often estranged. The biggest challenge for Vaught, and for the reader, is that Perry is not always an easy guy to like. Midcareer, Perry (with considerable help from Bob Sudyk) authored a memoir (Me and The Spitter: An Autobiographical Confession, New York: Saturday Review Press, 1974) in which Perry regales the reader with the devilish tale of a lovable country bumpkin staying one step ahead of the law. It's an awfully fun read, but the unvarnished version of the man deftly presented by Vaught is harder to warm up to. Vaught's book is about the man as much as it is about the ballplayer, so there is a lot of material on rural North Carolina, tobacco farming, and the local social politics, especially as it pertained to race. Perry lived around Black people his entire life; actual friendship between races in Williamston had its limits. Perry was an extremely dedicated, hard-working, often ruthless competitor who spent countless hours in the off-season on his craft to become and remain a great pitcher. But a baseball pitcher performs and is often judged apart from his teammates. Perry, a man who relied on a secret pitch that he was reluctant to discuss with anyone, was especially susceptible to thinking of himself as a solo artist. When he was breaking in with teammates like Willie Mays and Willie McCovey, he was appropriately grateful for their considerable help. But when he played on mediocre teams, which he did for most of his career, Perry could be disdainful of his teammates, especially defenders behind him. [End Page 135] One of the more fascinating episodes of Perry's baseball career came in late 1974 when the Cleveland Indians named Frank Robinson as the first Black manager in either the American or National Leagues. Perry was the best player on the Indians, the only star, and...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,147
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,937

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1480,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,225
Écart entre enseignants0,213 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207