MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389675690 · doi:10.1353/nin.2023.a914854

Baseball’s Endangered Species: Inside the Craft of Scouting by Those Who Lived It by Lee Lowenfish (review)

2023· article· en· W4389675690 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mitchell J Nathanson

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCraftEndangered speciesSubtitleArt historyVisual artsInsiderArtHistoryMedia studiesSociologyLawComputer sciencePolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Baseball's Endangered Species: Inside the Craft of Scouting by Those Who Lived It by Lee Lowenfish Mitchell Nathanson Lee Lowenfish. Baseball's Endangered Species: Inside the Craft of Scouting by Those Who Lived It. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2023. 344 pp. Cloth, $34.95. If you've ever had the hankering to spend some time chewing the cud with the old-timers who traveled the highways and byways of America and beyond to find the ballplayers you've watched on television since you were a kid, here's the book for you. Lee Lowenfish, the author of Branch Rickey: Baseball's Ferocious Gentleman, revisits Rickey's farm system through the eyes of Charlie Barrett, who Lowenfish describes as "Rickey's first and most beloved scout," (5) as well as spins the tales of eight other scouts who span the history of the game from 1919 through the late twentieth century. It's a journey down memory lane that will almost make you want to go out and beat the bushes yourself. It's not, however, an insider's guide to the craft of scouting, as the subtitle suggests. This is not a "how to" book by a longshot. Nor is it a detailed analysis of the merits of this scout over that one or this method as opposed to that method. Here again this marks an occasion where the subtitle gets the better of the book itself, diverting potential readers from the thrust of text that [End Page 122] is contained between the covers. I'm not sure why it is that the subtitles of so many books commit this unforced error, but here it is one more time, which is too bad because the book itself is a thoroughly engaging romp through the small-town, backwater origins of so many of the ballplayers most fans know only as established Major Leaguers. It's just not the book readers might think it is when they first scan the cover. Herein are tales of a handful of scouts as gathered by Lowenfish. Or, to be more precise, herein are tales that begin with perhaps a story centered around the scout whose name heads the chapter but then meanders here and there into stories of how this team or that team was built, some of which might arguably be attributable to the efforts of the titular scout himself. Lowenfish's narrative tends to bleed here and there, off to one aside and then another, but in a book like this the method works. After all, a book that attempted to draw a straight line between the work of any given scout and the success of his big league employer years down the road would be not only impossible but impossibly flawed; there are simply too many variables that affect the development of a given player between the day the scout signs him and the day he steps onto a big league diamond. What's more, it's simply more enjoyable to follow the ebb and flow of a narrative that goes wherever the story takes it, regardless of whether the scout himself gets lost in the shuffle on occasion. Most fans have never heard of any of the scouts around whom Lowenfish chooses to anchor his chapters, but they probably have heard of big leaguers who crossed their paths even if indirectly so Lowenfish's decision to widen rather than narrow his lens will probably be a comfort to most readers and, let's face it, more fun. Although the book doesn't present a scientific argument for the methods of "eyes and ears" scouting (as Lowenfish terms it) over the recent craze of more data-driven methods of prospect analysis, it does make a more general case through the course of the book's nine scout-centered chapters for the merits of the traditional approach. It's hard to tell, though, how and why one method might be preferable over the other. In the end, through either approach, players get drafted and a few reach the majors; fewer still succeed at that level. The analytic approach might have its drawbacks and blind spots, but, to this reader...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,060
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,941

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0600,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,250
Écart entre enseignants0,219 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207