MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389725980 · doi:10.1097/jps.0000000000000404

Conference Report

2023· article· en· W4389725980 sur OpenAlexaff
Michelle Felix

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Pediatric Surgical Nursing · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePediatric Pain Management Techniques
Établissements canadiensCanadian Parks and Wilderness Society
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePain medicinePain managementModalitiesPsychological interventionAnesthesiologyNursingAnesthesia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The 32nd Annual Scientific Conference from the American Pediatric Surgical Nurses Association was held virtually this year on May 11–12, 2023. The 2-day conference was packed with up-to-date information for pediatric surgical nurses and advanced practice nurses. The first day was focused on pain management and had dynamic speakers discuss various aspects of pain management for the pediatric surgical patient. The second day included a variety of exciting topics and some of the latest research. The following abstracts were chosen as the Top Abstracts from the conference abstract review committee. PEDIATRIC PAIN MANAGEMENT—HOW TO MAKE THE MAGIC HAPPEN Teresa Reyburn-Orne, MSN, PPCNP-BC, CPNP-AC, PMGT-BC, AP-PMN Associate Director of Pain Services and Advanced Practice Senior Instructor, Division of Pediatric Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Pediatric surgical nurses assess and manage pain in the inpatient setting, yet nurses often receive little pain management education. Healthcare providers write orders, but it is up to the pediatric surgical nurse to enact the orders in a way that provides the most effective and safest pain management. Nurses must understand pain physiology and the pharmacology of pain medicines including effects and side effects. Pediatric surgical nurses should review pain physiology and be knowledgeable about which point within the pain pathways that different medications and modalities can attenuate pain. Nursing inventions for pain management include nonopioid medications, opioid medications, regional analgesia, and nonpharmacologic interventions. Understanding the short- and long-term effects of undertreated pain in children is crucial to improving patient outcomes. SEDATION FOR SURGICAL PROCEDURES OUTSIDE OF AN OPERATING ROOM: THE ROLE OF THE ADVANCED PRACTICE PROVIDER Peggy Dorr, DNP, MSN, CRNP-PC, and Brieann E. Maurer, MSN, CRNP-AC Pediatric Nurse Practitioner, Sedation Service University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD Children requiring the services of a surgical practice frequently need sedation for procedures to inform the diagnosis or for the surgical intervention, and the number of procedures performed outside an operating room has continued to increase over the years. Many facilities utilize medical providers such as intensivists or hospitalists to provide the sedation. We present our experience with a nurse practitioner (NP)-led sedation practice. NPs have the acute care knowledge and skills necessary to effectively triage pediatric patients, develop a sedation plan for any given procedure, safely administer sedative agents, and respond to adverse events. Our NPs have pediatric critical care experience, spent clinical time with anesthesia for advanced airway skill management, and are Pediatric Advanced Life Support certified. With their nursing colleagues, they perform structured, evidence-based presedation assessments to ensure the child is safe for procedural sedation. This team can provide sedation for procedures such as drain placement, or biopsy, eliminating the need to schedule with an operating room team. The most common sedatives used are midazolam, dexmedetomidine, and ketamine, and over the last 7 years (averaging more than 300 sedation encounters per year), the success rate is 99.5%, and no major adverse events have occurred. Given the team's extensive pediatric experience, they are experts in providing developmentally appropriate interactions with the patients and necessary education to both patient and family to allay anxieties and ensure understanding, all contributing to a positive outcome. AN UPDATE ON PEDIATRIC UROLOGIC CONDITIONS Adelaide Garcia, CPNP-AC Pediatric Nurse Practitioner Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD Pediatric surgical NPs may manage urologic conditions in pediatric patients. Hydronephrosis, a urologic condition characterized by the dilation of any portion of the collecting system of the kidney, is one of the common urologic conditions seen in pediatric patients. Pediatric patients would benefit from early detection and intervention to prevent long-term complications. Various treatment options, including medical management and surgical interventions, are often needed to improve patient outcomes. Neurogenic bladder, a condition resulting from dysfunction of the bladder, can be caused by various neurologic disorders. Essential aspects such as diagnosis, bladder management techniques, pharmacological interventions, and urinary diversions are treatment options available to patients. Finally, scrotal conditions, encompassing a broad spectrum of pathologies such as testicular torsion, undescended testes, and scrotal pain, can also occur in pediatric male patients. The clinical manifestations, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment options including surgical interventions are avenues the pediatric surgical NP can explore in these patients. The assessment, management, and treatment strategies employed by pediatric surgical NPs in urologic conditions are commonly encountered in clinical practice. Pediatric surgical NPs would benefit from an enhanced understanding of these complex pediatric urologic conditions aimed at improving patient care and outcomes.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,450
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,642

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,015
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0080,004
Science ouverte0,0030,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,5500,340

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,355
Écart entre enseignants0,311 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; l’étiquette directe de Gemma et le classifieur distillé Codex s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Pediatric Surgical Nursing→Même sujetPediatric Pain Management Techniques→Travaux en français237 207→