Vibration serviceability performance of mass timber floors with beam supports and concrete topping
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Mass timber panels are frequently utilized as load-bearing components in the construction of floors, walls, and roofs within mid-rise or high-rise wooden buildings. In comparison to other building materials like concrete and steel, floors constructed using mass timber panels have relatively lighter weight and lower bending stiffness, which makes them more susceptible to vibrations resulting from human activity. The floor vibration can significantly affect the comfort of its occupants, and the vibration serviceability limit design often governs the maximum allowable span of mass timber floors. The limited quantity and complexity of research on the vibration performance of mass timber floors underscore the urgent need for further investigation. This research focused on assessing the vibration performance of mass timber slab floors with beam supports and concrete toppings. The two investigations included experimental tests to determine the dynamic properties of these floors and gathered subjective ratings from occupants to evaluate the floor's vibration performance. Additionally, numerical modeling approaches were suggested in each study and verified by using test results. The applicability of three contemporary design methods for timber floor vibration was assessed by comparing the experimental results with the predictions generated by each method. The results of this research have highlighted the significant influence of support stiffness on the vibration performance and dynamic properties of mass timber slab floors. Transitioning from rigid wall supports to realistic beam supports can cause a notable shift in the floor's vibration performance, potentially moving it from acceptable to unacceptable. In such cases, the fundamental natural frequency can decrease by more than 40%, but the deflection under point load remained consistent. The method proposed by Kollar demonstrated a remarkable level of accuracy in predicting the fundamental natural frequency of beam-supported floors. The impact of adding a floating concrete topping to the floor's dynamic properties depends on specific construction details like support conditions and floor-to-concrete thickness ratio. Within this research, introducing a floating concrete topping to mass timber floors significantly improved their vibration performance. This improvement had the potential to change the initial subjective rating of the floor from unacceptable to acceptable. Various degrees of partial composite action were observed between the concrete and timber layers depending on different floor assemblies. The commonly used floor vibration design methods exhibited limitations when employed in the design of mass timber floors with varying construction details. To achieve more accurate predictions of their vibration performance, future study is recommended.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».