Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The QED-physical (QED-P) theory [J. H. Wilson, Phys. Essays 35 , 5 (2022)] is actually the theory Dirac sought in 1962 in his attempt to predict the muon as an “extensible model of the electron.” Recently, Lerche attempted to produce a classical solution to Dirac’s equation for the radial motion of an extensible, basically classical, model of the electron. Both Dirac and Lerche proceeded in the wrong, classical direction in this effort. The QED-P center of charge (CoC) position operator is derived directly from the Dirac equation (DE) CoC velocity operator, cα with no ad hoc assumptions. QED-P was integrated with QED into a single theory , and that integration is proved by the highly accurate estimates of QED that are dependent on the DE velocity operator c α . Both QED and QED-P are based directly on the same Dirac Equation (DE) four current c( α , I ) that QED couples with an external electromagnetic field. QED uses covariant perturbation theory to produce highly accurate results, except for the electron selfenergy, which is infinite. The DE velocity operator, c α , is the spatial part of the free electron four current, and has highly unusual properties compared to classical velocity vectors. QED could not produce highly accurate answers without the 4 × 4 complex matrix c α as the electron CoC “velocity” operator. QED-P simply integrates the same Dirac equation four current used so successfully in QED, and produces the discrete internal spatial and time coordinate operators (ISaTCOs) to give the electron field’s internal structure a very specific, but highly, nonclassical geometric description, with no ad hoc assumptions. QED and QED-P are complementary theories, and both are proven to be true by the accurate results of QED . The physical interpretation of QED-P is discussed in this paper as a two-dimensional, rapidly vibrating “ point ” charge, that is always located on a 2D CoC sphere in the electron rest frame, oscillating rapidly through eight eigenvalues with an ISaTCO period of ∼10 −22 s. The fact that the CoC’s eight ISaTCO spatial eigenvectors are always are located on a 2D shell encompassing the electron’s 3D “space” inside the CoC’s 2D shell is a direct consequence of the DE, and nothing else. In this paper, it is shown that the “discrete” ISaTCOs produce a one dimensional, discrete quantum harmonic oscillator with its ISaTCOs always located on a 2D CoC shell. The CoC shell is an “2D hologram” emerging from a 3D volume inside the 2D CoC shell with a vibrational electronic clock” producing an internal phase that is propagated throughout space/time. The QED-P point electron charge rotates 720° to complete one internal electron discrete period. The electron’s spin and magnetic moment [J. H. Wilson, Phys. Essays 29 , 402 (2016); ibid. 31 (1), 59‐67 (2018); ibid. 34 , 17 (2021)] are generated by the CoC ISaTCO in QED-P, and there is no need for “intrinsic” properties. The QED-P electron properties described above d are far different than the standard model’s very small point particle with intrinsic properties of spin and magnetic moment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».