Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Fifteenth-century Italy was a battleground for philosophical, religious, and political dominance. Orthodox identities, formed and maintained in the force field of the Catholic church, were haunted by other options with the return of long-lost Platonic texts, Greek Hermetic tractates, and Latin translations of Arabic Hermeticist writings. At the epicenter was Marsilio Ficino, Florentine priest and polymath, who translated many of these works from Greek into Latin. He strained to place Hermetic/Neoplatonic wisdom within the strictures of Catholic doctrine and found himself in the Inquisition's crosshairs due to his book De Vita Coelitus Comparanda (1489). In this work he hints at unorthodox human potentials, claiming that musicians who follow his system can birth a daemonic life-form, in deifying (and possibly heretical) mimicry of Genesis. Trouble in Rome Marsilio Ficino had a lot on his mind in the autumn of 1489. Imagine him pacing the hallways and gardens of the Villa Careggi, an estate in the hills near Florence and his home for decades under the patronage of the Medici family. Marsilio was worried, and rightly so. He was soon—that very December—to publish a radical work. Word of its contents had reached the Holy Office of the Inquisition in Rome. Someone there was unhappy. Ficino was in trouble, and knew it. He had pushed to the limit, and the Church’s antibodies were stirring. All our evidence for his concern lies in his own writings—nothing has turned up in any Vatican archive. The text in question was part of a larger work called De Vita Libri Tres (“Three Books about Life”). The first two volumes gave uncontroversial advice on health and longevity. The third Book about Life was different. Its title— De Vita Coelitus Comparanda ( De Vita 3, henceforth DV 3)—has been translated as “on obtaining life from the heavens.” A draft version had been shared and must have reached eyes in Rome. Before turning to the book's content and the background we need to make sense of the ruckus, let us look at the signs in the text that clouds were gathering over the Villa Careggi. Most telling are two postscripts issued with the published work. Each addresses Ficino's elite friends by name, asking for help in dramatic terms. One is described as a “Hercules” called to defeat “the hundred heads of the hydra threatening our books.”
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,119 | 0,033 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».