Predicting River Discharge in the Niger River Basin: A Deep Learning Approach
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Across West Africa, the River Niger is a major source of freshwater. In addition, the river system also provides services such as aquaculture, transportation, and hydropower. The river network plays a critical role in the hydropolitics and hydroeconomics of the region. Therefore, River Niger is integral to the development of West Africa, hence, there is a need to ensure that the river’s ecosystem is a healthy one. In light of the changing climate and its associated threats such as droughts and floods, constant monitoring and measurements of the the river’s flow system cannot be overemphasized. This study investigates temporal variations in annual river discharge characteristics at eight stations (Koulikoro, Dioila, Kirango, Douna, Mopti, Dire, Ansongo, and Niamey) in the Niger River basin, presenting detailed quantitative findings. Analyzing discharge data of River Niger from 1950 to 1990, the minimum discharge measures (minimum and 10th percentile) exhibit a consistent decreasing trend post-1960, persisting into the 1990s at several stations. Central tendency measures (mean and 50th percentile) also consistently reduced since 1950, with near-zero median values observed in Diola and Douna. Recovery in mean discharge is evident in Ansongo after 1980. Extreme values (maximum and 90th percentile) show decreasing trends across all stations, with some locations exhibiting a slight recovery after 1980. The decreasing trend in annual minimum, mean, and maximum values has implications for water resources, affecting hydroelectric generation, fish farming, and dry season irrigation. Machine learning algorithms (MLAs) are deployed to predict the prediction of monthly river discharge, with LSTM identified as the best-performing model overall. However, model performance varies across locations, with TCN excelling in Diola but underperforming in Koulikoro. This study emphasizes the chaotic nature of time series data and external drivers limiting the long-term predictive capabilities of MLAs. Quantitative evaluation of MLA performance reveals specific strengths and weaknesses at each station. This study underscores the importance of predicting the 10th percentile of annual river discharge for water resource planning. Models exhibit diverse performance across basins, emphasizing the need for tailored approaches. Further analysis considers measures of central tendencies, predicting the 50th percentile (Q50) and mean discharge values. TCN emerges as the best model for Q50 prediction, showcasing superior performance over other models. Additionally, the study delves into predicting high and low extreme discharges, crucial for understanding potential flood events and preparing for meteorological and hydrological droughts. This study concludes by emphasizing the necessity for location-specific studies in the River Niger basin to facilitate an enhanced integrated river management system.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».