Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Defining the Kindertransport The Kindertransport was an international rescue effort that took place between 1938 and 1940. To escape the impact of Nazism, Jewish refugee children, or “Kinder” as they are collectively known today, fled their homelands (in Germany, Austria, Czechoslovakia, and Poland) to Britain, the Netherlands, France, Belgium, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland. It was “conceived as a transmigratory scheme” with the idea that the children would be relocated beyond British shores at some point. But even in Britain itself the Kinder faced relocation several times over. They became “enemy aliens” and were interned in Britain, Canada, and Australia, or moved as emigrants to America and New Zealand. In the postwar period, many Kinder made yet further journeys to be reunited with surviving family members. Some went to Israel, setting up Moshavim and Kibbutzim such as Kibbutz Lavi. A few Kinder even returned to their former homelands. However, the Kindertransport did not always save the children. While many of those who found refuge in countries bordering Germany such as the Netherlands and France survived the war, others were caught up in deportations following the Nazi invasion and were murdered in the Holocaust. The following book sets out to study the way the Kindertransport has been represented in public memory in the English-speaking host nations and in Germany, the country from which most of the Kinder came. For reasons of space, we have not examined the extent to which the topic has been represented in Austria, Poland, or Czechoslovakia, although we do make occasional reference to memorials and exhibitions in these countries. We explore Kindertransport memorialization not least through the lens of the national memory frameworks obtaining in each country under discussion, at the same time highlighting through our comparative approach the way differences between these frameworks impacted on memorialization in each case. We focus mainly on memorials, exhibitions and commemorative events, asking also to what extent transnational memory trends have influenced these. Given that the Kindertransport was itself an international event—something that should not be overlooked despite Britain's central role—it would seem, ideally at least, to lend itself to a transnational optic. We have written this book because, to date, most studies of the Kindertransport, whether in English or German, focus rather on its history.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,047 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».