50 Neuropsychological Functioning in Depression, Borderline Personality Disorder, and Suicidality
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objective: Depression and borderline personality disorder (BPD) are frequently comorbid psychiatric disorders that reliably share deficits in executive functioning (EF). In addition to EF, meta-analytic evidence indicates that processing speed and verbal memory are also affected in depression and BPD, but the impact of BPD further spans the domains of attention, nonverbal memory, and visuospatial abilities. Suicidality is a notable phenotypic commonality in depression and BPD. Neuropsychologically, there are consistent discrepancies between individuals who have and have not thought about suicide in global cognitive functioning, as well as between those who have attempted suicide and those who have just thought about suicide in EF. This study aims to replicate the effect size differences between these groups and explore whether neuropsychological functioning relates to dimensional measures of psychopathology. Participants and Methods: Right-handed women between the ages of 18 and 55 were recruited into one of three diagnostic groups: a) current major depressive episode (MDD; n=22); b) current major depressive episode with comorbid BPD (MDD+BPD; n=19); and c) absence of current major depressive episode and BPD (controls; n=20). Groups were also classified based on historical suicide attempt and on the presence or absence of historical suicidal ideation. Exclusions included bipolar disorder, neurodevelopmental disorder, moderate/severe brain injury, neurological illness, serious physical illness, eating disorder, and moderate/severe alcohol/substance use disorder. Participants were administered the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder (ZAN-BPD), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ), UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale, Everyday Memory Questionnaire, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test (BVMT), California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT), Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Color-Word Interference Test, D-KEFS Trail Making Test, D-KEFS Verbal Fluency, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV Coding and Digit Span subtests, Wechsler Memory Scale-IV Logical Memory, and Wechsler Test of Adult Reading. Results: With one exception, analyses of raw scores indicated there were no significant neuropsychological differences between groups based on diagnosis, historical suicidal ideation, and suicide attempt (p>.05). However, individuals with MDD+BPD, historical suicidal ideation, or suicide attempt endorsed more memory complaints than the other groups with large effect size differences. Differences in self-reported impulsivity indicated large effects between controls and MDD+BPD, moderate to large effects when comparing controls to MDD and MDD to MDD+BPD, and moderate effects among the suicidal ideation and suicide attempt groups. Impulsivity was rated highest in those with MDD+BPD, historical suicidal ideation, or suicide attempt. These analyses applied false-discovery rate correction and adjusted for age. Using ridge regressions to separately predict depressive symptoms, BPD symptoms, and suicide risk factors, neuropsychological indices were most associated with suicide risk factors and explained 22.8% of INQ variance. Conversely, these indices explained 9.6% of ZAN-BPD variance and 0.6% of BDI-II variance. Conclusions: The neuropsychological literature on BPD describes moderate crosscutting neuropsychological dysfunction, and clarifying the distinct cognitive alterations associated with comorbid psychiatric disorders and suicide phenomena offers novel avenues of research for investigating their mechanisms. While neuropsychological functioning may not strongly relate to psychiatric symptomatology, it may contribute to meaningful algorithms of suicide risk in individuals with depression and BPD.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».