Rita Bode, Lesley D. Clements, E. Holly Pike, and Margaret Steffler, eds., Children and Childhoods in L. M. Montgomery: Continuing Conversations
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I was recently hiking in Europe and walked with dozens of people from around the world -New Zealand, Germany, US, Poland, Ireland, Slovakia, Indonesia -and about half of the people I met knew Prince Edward Island, the tiny Canadian province I live in.Those who did, knew it for one reason: Anne of Green Gables.They told stories about how central it and other novels by L. M. Montgomery were in their childhoods, how much their ideas about themselves and their early identities were shaped as children by the power of Montgomery's writing.They are the "Anneites" or "Maud Squad" that Kate Scarth refers to in her chapter of the edited collection Children and Childhoods in L. M. Montgomery.In this varied but uniformly strong collection of essays about connections, conversations, confluences, and influences in Montgomery's works, we get a sense of where that power comes from, power over both child and adult readers for over a hundred years and from around the world.Children and Childhoods in L. M. Montgomery covers a lot of ground in Montgomery studies.It arranges its twelve essays into four groupings: conversing with the past; fantasy, the ideal, and reality; transformative relationships and spaces; and anime, fanfiction, and TV adaptations.Two big ideas run through the collection.The first is the way Montgomery redefines, rethinks, and models children and childhood through her characters, a thread that makes this a very useful addition to the history of the idea of the child.The second is the complex interplay of connections to texts, characters, and genres that Montgomery or her readers make beyond the novels themselves.Those connections are presented variously as "influence," "confluence," and my favorite, "conversation," and the essays together insist on the richness that comes when one has, in the words of the introduction, "meaningful conversations with what one is reading" (7).Kate Scarth's examination of domestic space in Montgomery's Emily of New Moon and Jane Austen's Mansfield Park is a stand-out.She elegantly traces how the two heroines, Emily and Fanny, claim agency through natural and domestic spaces.Equally strong and quite moving at times is Lesley D. Clement's look at the understanding of death and dying in Montgomery's novels and how the child characters come to terms with loss.Margaret Steffler traces the "Performance of the Beautiful Dream Boy" in Montgomery's novels and Frances Hodgson Burnett's, drawing connections between the fictional boys and the authors' own sons.Bonnie Tulloch is interested in the blurring of the real and the fantastic and the distinction between adult and child responses to the fantastic as she connects Anne and Peter Pan.Asa Warnqvist has new and interesting things to say about playful and imaginative children as she connects Anne with Pippi Longstocking.Other essays raise connections with Shakespeare, Madeleine L'Engle, Suzanne Collins, Charles Dickens, and then the afterlives of Anne in animé, adaptations, and fanfiction, all suggesting how centered L. M. Montgomery is within this rich and generative
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».