Characterization of cognitive profile in young patients in Buenos Aires, Argentina: preliminary analysis of 5 years and comparing pre‐pandemic and in‐pandemic period
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Cognitive manifestations are an increasingly frequent reason for consultation among young adults ranging from a subjective cognitive complaint (CC), mood or behavioral disorders to attention disorders or other cognitive functions with an impact on their functionality. The objective of this work is to analyze the cognitive profile of patients evaluated during last 5 years, characterize them and compare the results before the COVID‐19 pandemic and after. Method 742 cognitive evaluations were analyzed from a database of patients between 40 and 60 years old who consulted for CC and were evaluated with a standard neurocognitive battery (SNB) between July 2017 and July 2022. Demographic data, screening test (MMSE or MoCA), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI‐2) and/or Hospital Depression and Anxiety Scale (HAD), Wender Utah Rating Scale (WURS) and final assessment diagnosis including criteria for cognitive disorders and depression according to DSM V were performed. Period from 2017 to 2019 was considered pre‐pandemic COVID‐19 period and period from 2020 to 2022 as pandemic period. Result 65.6% were female. Pre‐pandemic, 441 patients were evaluated and 296 during pandemic. The average MMSE/MOCA score was: MMSE (328 total): 26.8 and MOCA (402 total): 24.4. Percentage of normal SNB was 17%, of “cognitive deficit”, without conforming deterioration was 36.8%, mild cognitive disorder (mCD) was 43.4%, mayor cognitive disorder (MCD) greater than 2.6%. Of all the patients, depression diagnosis by Beck/ HAD or DSM V was 59.3%. In addition, 25% of the patients had history of TDAH (Attention deficit disorder and hyperactivity) according to WURS. Only 2 patients were evaluated for Intellectual Disability. Conclusion In this preliminary work, we detected that a high percentage of young patients with CC present some alteration in their cognitive function and almost 60% meet criteria for depression that could impact in these functions. In addition, 25% of patients had a history of TDAH. No significant difference was found between pre and pandemic. We are expanding the sample to be able to characterize the alterations with more specificity.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle