Age in Place, Move in VR: Investigating the Feasibility and Usability of a Custom‐made Virtual Reality Exergame to Promote the Well‐being of Community‐Dwelling Older Adults
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Interactive virtual reality (VR) games combined with exercise (exergames) are a plausible strategy to encourage physical activity (PA) among older adults. However, there is little systematic evaluation of the feasibility, usability, and potential benefits of deploying at‐home VR exergames among this population. Method Fifteen community‐dwelling older adults (M = 67.33 ± 5.3, age range 60‐77) (Table1) were recruited to play 18 sessions (each 15‐20 min) of a custom‐made VR exergame at home over six weeks. Recruitment, retention, and adherence rates were calculated to determine feasibility. The usability of the exergame was assessed through i) a game user experience questionnaire, ii) a self‐reported physical/emotional discomfort questionnaire, and iii) a perceived enjoyment scale. The exploratory outcome measures included changes in i) PA, ii) exercise self‐efficacy, iii) affect, iv) various cognitive and perceptual tasks and were assessed i) before and after acute data, and ii) before and after the intervention. Result Thirteen participants completed the study (13% attrition rate) without missing any exergaming session (100% adherence rate). The completion rate of cognitive assessments, perceptual tasks, and self‐reported questionnaires was = 97%. Low levels of cybersickness were reported (M = 0.9 ±1.0 out of 10). The average perceived enjoyment and perceived rate of exertion were 3.2. ±1.1 (out of 5) and 2.4±1.9 (out of 10), respectively. Most of the participants (92.3%) found the exergame’s instructions easy to follow and had an overall positive experience (84.6%). Whereas the exergame was perceived as useful for increasing PA levels (61.6%), mood enhancement was reported among less than half of participants (46.2%) and only 38% indicated that they would choose VR exergaming for at‐home PA. The likelihood of playing VR exergames in the future was also low (38.5%). The exploratory outcome measures are presented in Table 2. Conclusion Our study provides insights into the feasibility and usability of a custom‐made VR exergaming intervention to promote PA in community‐dwelling older adults which may potentially benefit their well‐being. Our findings inform the future adoption of VR at home. Our results can also be used to inform large‐scale trials and support the design and deployment of other remote exergames and assessments.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».