Tackling Obesity Through Bariatric Surgery: Long-Term Outcomes and Complication Rates
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: The prevalence of obesity and its associated health risks have led to a growing interest in bariatric surgery as a treatment option. Sleeve gastroplasty, a common bariatric procedure, has shown promise in addressing obesity-related issues. However, comprehensive studies evaluating its long-term effectiveness and safety are needed to understand its full impact on patient health, including both physical and mental aspects. Objective: This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of sleeve gastroplasties by assessing patients who underwent the surgery (Patient Group, PG) against those who did not (Control Group, CG). The primary focus was on the resolution of obesity comorbidities, overall surgical morbidity, severe surgical complications, mental health outcomes, and total weight loss percentage (TWL%) over two years. Methods: The study involved 136 participants, evenly divided between the PG and CG. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was utilized to ensure balanced comparisons. Key measures included TWL%, resolution of obesity comorbidities, severe surgical complications, total surgical morbidity, and mental health adverse events. Statistical analyses were conducted to identify significant differences between the groups at the two-year follow-up. Results: After one year, the PG exhibited a TWL% of 32.7%, whereas the CG showed 36.6%, a statistically significant difference (p = 0.002). Surgical morbidity was notably higher in the PG (28%) compared to the CG (17%), with a significant difference (p = 0.01). Severe surgical complications were similar between groups (4% in PG vs. 3% in CG, p = 0.44). Mental health adverse events were more prevalent in the PG. Both groups had comparable remission rates of obesity-related comorbidities at the one-year mark. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that sleeve gastroplasties result in effective weight reduction, as evidenced by the TWL% differences. However, the higher incidence of surgical morbidity and mental health issues in the PG underscores the need for comprehensive care, addressing both the physical and psychological aspects of bariatric surgery. Future research should focus on identifying factors influencing these outcomes to optimize the benefits of sleeve gastroplasties, considering individual patient profiles.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».