MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4390474460 · doi:10.1111/ddg.15301

Terbinafine‐induced generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) of von Zumbusch simulating toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN)

2023· letter· de· W4390474460 sur OpenAlexaff
Chaocheng Liu, Linghong Linda Zhou

Notice bibliographique

RevueJDDG Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft · 2023
Typeletter
Languede
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineErythemaToxic epidermal necrolysisDermatologyMalaisePsoriasisSkin biopsyPhysical examinationSurgeryBiopsyPathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dear Editors, A 69-year-old man with a history of post-angioplasty myocardial infarction, hypertension, and chronic renal dysfunction presented with a five-day history of progressive erythema that began over the chest before becoming generalized and involving most of the skin surface. Two days prior, he also reported facial swelling, cutaneous pustules, generalized skin sloughing, along with progressive skin tenderness. In addition, he complained of mild oral pain, fatigue, and malaise. Fifteen days prior to the onset of symptoms, his family physician prescribed him a three-week course of terbinafine 250 mg daily for an itchy groin rash. Three days before the onset of symptoms, he was started on a five-day course of prednisone 50 mg daily for a syncopal episode at the emergency department. His other long-term medications included ezetimibe, clopidogrel, aspirin, and metoprolol. In addition to his past medical history, he reported chronic erythematous, thick scaly plaques over his elbows for the past four years. On examination, he presented with an extensive eruption (Figure 1a–c). Notably, Nikolsky's sign was positive revealing areas of skin detachment (Figure 1d, e). The Asboe-Hansen sign was also positive. The total area of skin detachment was over 30% of the body surface area. He also had mucosal erosions of his hard palate. Further examination revealed diffuse nail pitting of his fingernails (Figure 1f). Lab work demonstrated significant neutrophilia of 22.1 × 109/l (4.0–10.0) with toxic granules and vacuoles on microscopy, elevated C reactive protein of 84.1 mg/l (< 10.0), elevated creatinine of 550 μmol/l (58–110), and mild hypocalcemia of 2.09 mmol/ml (2.10–2.55). Streptolysin O antibody, autoimmune serologies, urinalysis, and liver function were all unremarkable. Two skin biopsies, one each of a targetoid lesion and pustule, were taken, revealing intracorneal neutrophilic pustules, hypogranulosis and epidermal hyperplasia, and dilated dermal blood vessels, with notable absence of eosinophils (Figure 2a–c). Direct immunofluorescence of perilesional skin was negative. A thorough discussion of the treatment options, including systemic and topical corticosteroids and cyclosporine A, was completed with the patient. In the context of the patient's significant chronic renal dysfunction, consideration of the patient preference, and acknowledgement that we could initiate more aggressive treatment at any time if needed, we proceeded to begin initial treatment with generous application of clobetasol 0.05% ointment coupled with the immediate withdrawal of terbinafine. Gradual but significant improvement was then noted. Given the clinical history and the presence of extensive pustules, the differential diagnoses primarily included terbinafine-induced generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) of von Zumbusch or severe terbinafine-induced acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) with the unique presentation of extensive skin detachment. Generalized pustular psoriasis and AGEP can be very difficult to differentiate clinically given the significant overlap of clinical, and even histological, features. The acute onset in the setting of the initiation of a high-risk medication (terbinafine) without other infectious triggers raised the suspicion of AGEP.1 However, in our case, the diagnosis of GPP was preferred given the patient's history of chronic thick scaly plaques over the extensor surfaces suggestive of plaque psoriasis, the physical finding of nail pitting, laboratory findings of hypocalcemia and severe neutrophilia, in addition to the histological features of hypogranulosis and dilated dermal blood vessels without eosinophils. The literature on cases of AGEP and GPP simulating toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) was reviewed to further understand the characteristic of the unique phenotype of skin detachment with each condition. First, a total of 21 reported cases of AGEP simulating TEN revealed female predominance without tendency towards a specific age group.2 Many classes of medications, with a notable exception for terbinafine, have been reported to be the causative agents for of the unique presentation of AGEP with significant skin detachment (also known as AGEP with TEN-like desquamation), most commonly beta-lactam antibiotics.2 The eruption started an average of eight days (range of 1–19 days) after drug initiation.2 Patients presented with generalized erythema, pustules, skin blisters, and skin detachment.2 Skin histology showed typical features of AGEP including subcorneal pustules, perivascular inflammatory infiltrate, and most importantly eosinophils.2 On the other hand, a literature search for GPP cases simulating TEN found two cases.3, 4 Varman et al. reported a 42-year-old male with spontaneous onset of extensive skin desquamation simulating TEN, and skin histology showed classic features of GPP.3 Pomahac et al. reported a 55-year-old female presented with pustular eruption with skin desquamation after pre-operative antibiotic use, and the diagnosis was more ambiguous.4 The authors favored the diagnosis of GPP over AGEP, despite the presence of eosinophils on skin histology.4 This again emphasizes the challenge of differentiating GPP from AGEP in certain cases. In addition, a review of all reported cases of GPP triggered by terbinafine revealed the eruption started on an average of 23 days (range of 4–35 days) after drug initiation, which is longer than that of the AGEP simulating TEN.5-9 In summary, the diagnosis of terbinafine-induced GPP is favored in this case. We hope that this case further emphasizes the importance for clinicians to consider not only AGEP but also drug induced GPP when patients present with generalized pustular eruptions with positive Nikolsky's sign and skin detachment in the context of drug eruptions. Timely histological confirmation of the diagnosis and discontinuation of the medication are crucial. We would like to thank Dr. Richard Crawford for providing us with the histology figures and Dr. Jeffrey Toy for his assistance in the preliminary search of the literature. We would like to acknowledge Dr. Brian Kumimoto's involvement in the clinical management this patient. None.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,220
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0040,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0080,005
Bibliométrie0,0050,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0030,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,017
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,046
Tête enseignante GPT0,308
Écart entre enseignants0,262 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJDDG Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen GesellschaftMême sujetDrug-Induced Adverse ReactionsTravaux en français237 207