Improving Knowledge of Palliative Care in Rural South Dakota Through Community Education
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Purpose: To explore the effectiveness of education on increasing knowledge of palliative care and how to access palliative care services among community members. Design: A descriptive study using a retrospective survey was conducted after in-person educational events on palliative care. This study used the definition of rural and frontier provided by the South Dakota Department of Health which is based on the US Census Bureau population estimates (2020). Sample: Educational events occurred in 17 communities across South Dakota with 256 community members. Of which, 166 people completed the survey. Methods: Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed to evaluate for change in palliative care knowledge. Fisher’s Exact Test was utilized to analyze for an association between past palliative and hospice care use, palliative care knowledge, and confidence in finding palliative care services. Findings: The majority of educational events took place in rural or frontier locations with 85% of participants and 95.2% of survey respondents attending in a rural or frontier location. Most of the survey respondents (61.5%) were a caregiver of someone with a serious health condition, while 13.3% had a serious health condition and 3% were both a caregiver and had a serious health condition. After completion of the community education program, community members demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in their knowledge of palliative care and their confidence in being able to locate palliative care services, p <.001. Having used palliative care services was significantly associated with palliative care knowledge and confidence in accessing these services, p < .001. Conclusion: Performing education individualized to each community increased knowledge regarding palliative care and how to access these services. Additional needs of community members were discovered which is critically important to address as the rural population ages and is more likely to be living with serious illness(es). Keywords: palliative care, community education, rural DOI: https://doi.org/10.14574/ojrnhc.v23i2.750
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».