EEG-based hierarchical classification of level of demand and modality of auditory and visual sensory processing
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Objective. To date, most research on electroencephalography (EEG)-based mental workload detection for passive brain-computer interface (pBCI) applications has focused on identifying the overall level of cognitive resources required, such as whether the workload is high or low. We propose, however, that being able to determine the specific type of cognitive resources being used, such as visual or auditory, would also be useful. This would enable the pBCI to take more appropriate action to reduce the overall level of cognitive demand on the user. For example, if a high level of workload was detected and it is determined that the user is primarily engaged in visual information processing, then the pBCI could cause some information to be presented aurally instead. In our previous work we showed that EEG could be used to differentiate visual from auditory processing tasks when the level of processing is high, but the two modalities could not be distinguished when the level of cognitive processing demand was very low. The current study aims to build on this work and move toward the overall objective of developing a pBCI that is capable of predicting both the level and the type of cognitive resources being used. Approach. Fifteen individuals undertook carefully designed visual and auditory tasks while their EEG data was being recorded. In this study, we incorporated a more diverse range of sensory processing conditions including not only single-modality conditions (i.e. those requiring one of either visual or auditory processing) as in our previous study, but also dual-modality conditions (i.e. those requiring both visual and auditory processing) and no-task/baseline conditions (i.e. when the individual is not engaged in either visual or auditory processing). Main results. Using regularized linear discriminant analysis within a hierarchical classification algorithm, the overall cognitive demand was predicted with an accuracy of more than 86%, while the presence or absence of visual and auditory sensory processing were each predicted with an accuracy of approximately 70%. Significance. The findings support the feasibility of establishing a pBCI that can determine both the level and type of attentional resources required by the user at any given moment. This pBCI could assist in enhancing safety in hazardous jobs by triggering the most effective and efficient adaptation strategies when high workload conditions are detected.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».