MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4390614991 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2024.a916735

Lost and Found Voices: Four Gay Male Writers in Exile by Luc Beaudoin (review)

2024· article· en· W4390614991 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Modern Language Review · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSoviet and Russian History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQueerHistorySubject (documents)Gender studiesHuman sexualitySociologyLiteratureArt

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Lost and Found Voices: Four Gay Male Writers in Exile by Luc Beaudoin Connor Doak Lost and Found Voices: Four Gay Male Writers in Exile. By Luc Beaudoin. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press. 2022. x+ 252 pp. can $95. ISBN 978–0–2280–138–7. Luc Beaudoin's excellent study explores four queer writers whose lives and work spanned multiple countries, cultures, and languages: Witold Gombrowicz (1904–1969; Poland, Argentina, France), Valerii Pereleshin (1913–1992; Russia, China, Brazil), Abdellah Taïa (b. 1973; Morocco, France), and Slava Mogutin (b. 1974; Soviet Union, United States). All these writers lived in 'exile' from their home country and—to some degree—from their first language, and Beaudoin considers the intersection between sexual, national, and linguistic identities. The author makes clear his personal stake from the outset, announcing his positionality as a 'queer reader' who 'interpret[s] [these texts] from [his own] experiences' (p. 13). Beaudoin shares how the threads of linguistic and sexual self-discovery have intertwined in his own life: while the language of his childhood home was French, he writes that '[his] gayness is Anglophone' (p. 6) and calls himself 'a gay man effaced from my own native language' (p. 8). While this personal voice is strongest in the Introduction, he occasionally returns to first-person anecdotes and observations throughout the volume. The book contains four principal chapters, one for each author. While Pereleshin, Taïa, and Mogutin were/are open about their sexuality, Gombrowicz's has been the subject of much speculation. Beaudoin makes no bones about it: Gombrowicz 'was queer all his life and in all of his writing' (p. 17). He defends this view not only through his analysis of Kronos, Gombrowicz's intimate diary (published only in 2013) that reveals the extent of the author's encounters with men, but also through a sophisticated unpacking of the writer's experiments with form throughout his œuvre, which both express and evade his queerness. While the relationship between sexuality and form is central to Beaudoin's analysis of Gombrowicz, the nexus between sexuality and language comes into focus in his Pereleshin chapter (Chapter 2). Beaudoin argues that Pereleshin 'became openly gay in Portuguese', with the new language offering a 'liberation' for the poet (p. 82). The comparative analysis of Pereleshin's Lusophone and Russophone poetry makes compelling [End Page 138] reading, especially the discussion of the two versions of the poem 'The Cannibal' (p. 90) in Russian and Portuguese. Beaudoin's third chapter examines how Taïa, the Moroccan–French novelist and film-maker, negotiates his identities as a gay man and an Arab in Paris, 'refram[ing] his homosexuality and queer desire in a fluid transcultural, translinguistic, and almost transphysical manner' (p. 118). Once again, Taïa's artistic work proves inextricably linked to his biography, and Beaudoin astutely maps how Taïa positions himself in relation to the metropole and to the Morocco he has left behind, particularly his troubled relationship with his mother. Chapter 4 will be more familiar to Slavists, as Beaudoin turns to the provocative writer and artist Mogutin. Beaudoin builds on previous work by Vitaly Chernetsky in discussing Mogutin's hypermasculine aesthetic and his critique of consumer capitalism, but treads new ground in identifying a 'softer form' (p. 174) in Mogutin's aesthetics from 2017 onwards. Overall, this is an insightful study that is strengthened by the author's personal reflections. The book could have been more explicitly comparative, especially in the Conclusion, which ostensibly unites the preceding four chapters under the umbrella of translation but actually, for the most part, treats each writer in a separate subsection. The style is engaging if sometimes unorthodox: the occasionally offeat and grammatically unconventional English is perhaps fitting for a book that challenges the strictures of language and how one articulates one's identity. The volume proves particularly timely in today's political moment, when a new wave of LGBTQ+ refugees are fleeing a Russia that has redoubled its anti-gay stance. Connor Doak University of Bristol Copyright © 2024 Modern Humanities Research Association

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,552
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,331
Écart entre enseignants0,303 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Modern Language ReviewMême sujetSoviet and Russian HistoryTravaux en français237 207