Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This book is the product of two networks that share a common commitment to community engagement and rigorous scholarship.The first is the Canadian Rural Revitalization Foundation (CRRF), which has, for over 20 years, brought together rural Canadians and national and international rural policy and development practitioners and scholars in rural locations all over Canada.We are indebted to the CRRF Board of Directors for their support in committing to a conference in Twillingate, Newfoundland, in October 2005 on these themes, and to their financial support in making this book possible.The second association is the North Atlantic Forum, which emerged as a biannual conference from the network established by the North Atlantic Islands Program at the University of Prince Edward Island in the early 1990s.This network of small-island and other coastal and peripheral jurisdictions shares much with CRRF in its commitment to building capacity and enhancing democracy in small and peripheral communities and jurisdictions.We are grateful to the North Atlantic Forum for partnering with CRRF in the 2005 Twillingate conference.Titled "Big Lessons from Small Places: A Forum on Governance in Rural North America and the North Atlantic Rim," this conference brought together community development practitioners, public policy-makers, and scholars in a spirit of open debate; they shared lessons from their work and ideas about new opportunities and key challenges for small jurisdictions working to maximize their prosperity and sustainability.Thanks to the reinvigoration provoked by this event, an international network of scholars and practitioners has been brought together as contributors to this book.The authors who contributed chapters to this book have been a very patient lot.Most participated in the conference four years ago, although a few were solicited to write chapters to fill gaps we felt needed to be addressed.The first draft of this book arrived at ISER Books as its long-time managing editor was retiring.We are grateful to Dr. Wayne Fife who, while serving as acting academic editor, got the proverbial wheels in motion and, as newly installed academic editor, completed the journey.We also thank the peer reviewers for their constructive and generous suggestions to improve this volume.Finally, we thank the people and organizations of Twillingate-New World Islands, who offered their hospitality and countless volunteer hours to make the 2005 conference both a memorable experience as well as a wonderful learning event.It is this commitment to place, and the identity and social relationships that go with it, that make rural communities and small, often island, jurisdictions desirable and viable places for long-term sustainable development.We hope that the lessons shared in this book contribute to policy and practice that empower people, communities, and regions to make the most of their opportunities,
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,021 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,470 | 0,367 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; l’étiquette directe de Gemma et le classifieur distillé Codex s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».