Access Without Borders: A Scoping Review to Identify Solutions to Creating Portable Identity, Education and Health Records for Refugee Children
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Review objective: The focus of this scoping review is to identify studies, reports, and other relevant sources from the peer-reviewed and grey literature that reports on refugee children’s access and barriers to portable identity, education, and health records at different stages during the migration process. Introduction: The child refugee crisis has become a global concern as many individuals risk their lives to escape the political violence, persecution, and war. Forcibly displaced children face the genuine challenge of being unable to acquire documents pre-migration or having documents lost, stolen, or destroyed during transit. Still, little is known about refugee children's challenges when accessing and maintaining personal records while moving within and across borders. We will consolidate existing information and analyze the barriers that limit access to identity, education, and health records at different stages of migration and the policies and practices to address record portability and interoperability problems. This work is part of a program of study that seeks to understand the institutional, social, and political aspects of a refugee child’s environment that potentiate their resilience under conditions of extreme stress. Inclusion criteria: The study included academic literature focused on the production, preservation, or transmission of records pertaining to identification, education, or health of refugee children, adolescents, and young adults. The review process was limited to documents written in the English language. Methods: We employed the framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley 1 for the methodological synthesis of research, as well as the modifications recommended by Levac and colleagues.2 Results of the search strategy were compiled and presented using the extended reporting guidelines for scoping reviews, as suggested by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA).3 Several bibliographic and grey literature databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Tandfonline, Proquest, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, Google Scholar, Google search engine, and UN agency websites, were searched to identify relevant studies. Results: Using electronic literature searches, 87 articles were identified, of which 8 were deemed eligible for inclusion in this study. In addition, we identified 7 news articles and 10 reports from international organizations, most of which were focused on issues related to education record portability, as well as initiatives aimed at recognizing digital credentials for refugee young people. All eligible documents were categorized into three themes based on the analysis targets: (1) examining the challenges faced by refugees in utilizing humanitarian identity systems; (2) highlighting the need for digital credentials for refugees; and (3) exploring the potential benefits of digital health interventions for refugees. Specifically, our search showed that digital identity systems need to be more flexible and tailored to individual refugee needs. With regard to education records, the retrieved grey literature prioritizes adults' needs, but adopting digital credentials and blockchain technology may solve traditional recognition systems' constraints, ensuring that refugee children's education is also supported. In contrast, digital health interventions, including EHRs and mobile health applications, have be better studied and shown to positively impact healthcare access, patient outcomes, and chronic disease management for refugees in high-resource host countries. Despite this potential for positive outcomes, the portability of health records remains an under-researched and under-resourced area of a refugee child’s life. Conclusion: The increasing number of refugee children globally necessitates urgent solutions to address their need for portable identity, education, and health records. This review highlights the potential of digital interventions to improve refugee children’s lives, including their resettlement outcomes. Furthermore, recent innovations like blockchain technology and digital credentials offer promising solutions for advancing equity for refugee children. Developing adaptable digital solutions and resources can enhance refugee children's access to health and education services, while also enabling them to obtain necessary documentation and identity verification for accessing basic rights and services.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,030 | 0,122 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,036 | 0,027 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».