MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4390675135 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3837529/v1

Access Without Borders: A Scoping Review to Identify Solutions to Creating Portable Identity, Education and Health Records for Refugee Children

2024· review· en· W4390675135 sur OpenAlexaff
Michael Ungar, A Seymour

Notice bibliographique

RevueResearch Square · 2024
Typereview
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueMigration, Health and Trauma
Établissements canadiensDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRefugeePersecutionPolitical sciencePublic relationsGrey literatureInclusion (mineral)Vulnerability (computing)Identity (music)PoliticsCriminologySociologyGender studiesComputer securityLawMEDLINEComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Review objective: The focus of this scoping review is to identify studies, reports, and other relevant sources from the peer-reviewed and grey literature that reports on refugee children’s access and barriers to portable identity, education, and health records at different stages during the migration process. Introduction: The child refugee crisis has become a global concern as many individuals risk their lives to escape the political violence, persecution, and war. Forcibly displaced children face the genuine challenge of being unable to acquire documents pre-migration or having documents lost, stolen, or destroyed during transit. Still, little is known about refugee children's challenges when accessing and maintaining personal records while moving within and across borders. We will consolidate existing information and analyze the barriers that limit access to identity, education, and health records at different stages of migration and the policies and practices to address record portability and interoperability problems. This work is part of a program of study that seeks to understand the institutional, social, and political aspects of a refugee child’s environment that potentiate their resilience under conditions of extreme stress. Inclusion criteria: The study included academic literature focused on the production, preservation, or transmission of records pertaining to identification, education, or health of refugee children, adolescents, and young adults. The review process was limited to documents written in the English language. Methods: We employed the framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley 1 for the methodological synthesis of research, as well as the modifications recommended by Levac and colleagues.2 Results of the search strategy were compiled and presented using the extended reporting guidelines for scoping reviews, as suggested by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA).3 Several bibliographic and grey literature databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Tandfonline, Proquest, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, Google Scholar, Google search engine, and UN agency websites, were searched to identify relevant studies. Results: Using electronic literature searches, 87 articles were identified, of which 8 were deemed eligible for inclusion in this study. In addition, we identified 7 news articles and 10 reports from international organizations, most of which were focused on issues related to education record portability, as well as initiatives aimed at recognizing digital credentials for refugee young people. All eligible documents were categorized into three themes based on the analysis targets: (1) examining the challenges faced by refugees in utilizing humanitarian identity systems; (2) highlighting the need for digital credentials for refugees; and (3) exploring the potential benefits of digital health interventions for refugees. Specifically, our search showed that digital identity systems need to be more flexible and tailored to individual refugee needs. With regard to education records, the retrieved grey literature prioritizes adults' needs, but adopting digital credentials and blockchain technology may solve traditional recognition systems' constraints, ensuring that refugee children's education is also supported. In contrast, digital health interventions, including EHRs and mobile health applications, have be better studied and shown to positively impact healthcare access, patient outcomes, and chronic disease management for refugees in high-resource host countries. Despite this potential for positive outcomes, the portability of health records remains an under-researched and under-resourced area of a refugee child’s life. Conclusion: The increasing number of refugee children globally necessitates urgent solutions to address their need for portable identity, education, and health records. This review highlights the potential of digital interventions to improve refugee children’s lives, including their resettlement outcomes. Furthermore, recent innovations like blockchain technology and digital credentials offer promising solutions for advancing equity for refugee children. Developing adaptable digital solutions and resources can enhance refugee children's access to health and education services, while also enabling them to obtain necessary documentation and identity verification for accessing basic rights and services.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,030
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,122
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: Revue systématique
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,036
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,159

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0300,122
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0050,006
Bibliométrie0,0360,027
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,003
Communication savante0,0070,009
Science ouverte0,0030,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,323
Tête enseignante GPT0,664
Écart entre enseignants0,341 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeRevue systématique
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueResearch Square→Même sujetMigration, Health and Trauma→Travaux en français237 207→