Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction to Part III Although we must reject the romantic concept of the wandering minstrel, it is true that minstrels travelled frequently and in many cases long distances. Liveried household minstrels were often in the company of their employers, who travelled widely between their own properties and on military or political business. Chapter 8 examines two specific cases in which minstrels accompanied a princess going to her wedding, examples of a temporary household travelling a considerable distance. These are an uncommon occurrence, but they shed light on the circumstances surrounding the journey of a noble and her household, and by implication give some information about the planning of such an event. Planning must certainly have been an important element in minstrel travel, whatever the circumstances. Even when liveried household minstrels took to the road independently (Chapter 9) it was along pre-planned routes, on a time-bounded itinerary, and with the specific purpose of obtaining financial reward as efficiently as possible. Independent minstrels almost certainly travelled much shorter distances, for in general they had no need to do otherwise: their financial rewards tended to be local, and attending events further away carried the risk of earning too little to make it worthwhile. For them too, travelling haphazardly and arriving at a venue unexpectedly was poor practice and unlikely to be rewarded. Minstrels, like anyone else, were entirely serious about earning a living. Only one type of occasion made it financially sensible for a minstrel to travel to a venue ‘on spec’: fairs. There the potential rewards were considerable and available to all, depending only on the minstrel's ability to entertain. For this purpose, it was worthwhile for an independent minstrel to travel rather further than usual. This meant that for several days, while the fair continued, there would be both known and unknown entertainers present, making what money they could. It was a situation where criminals would be active, particularly pickpockets and cut-purses but also charlatans posing as entertainers, and it demanded some regulation (Chapter 10). In the first place this was provided by the owner of the land (or of the fair, if different). While some policing was necessary to keep order at the fair, eventually exercised through minstrel-courts, most of the evidence for this control arose because of financial arrangements: landowners exacted fees from minstrels and others in return for licence to perform or trade.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,456 | 0,220 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».