Cells Remain Viable When Collected With an In‐Line‐Suction Tissue Collector From Byproducts of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Purpose To investigate the viability of cells collected with an in‐line‐suction autologous tissue collector from the tissue byproducts of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, to characterize cells from different tissue types, and to identify mesenchymal stem cells. Methods Patients aged 14 to 50 years with ACL injuries requiring arthroscopic reconstruction surgery were offered enrollment and screened for participation. In total, 12 patients were enrolled in the descriptive laboratory study. Arthroscopic byproduct tissue was collected with an in‐line‐suction autologous tissue collector from 4 intraoperative collection sites for each patient: ACL stump, ACL fat pad, notchplasty debris, and tunnel drilling debris. All tissue samples were digested using collagenase, and the derived cellular populations were analyzed in vitro, characterizing cellular viability, proliferative potential, qualitative multipotent differentiation capacity, and cell‐surface marker presence. Results An equivalent mass of arthroscopic byproduct tissue was taken from each of the 4 intraoperative collection sites (1.12‐1.61 g, P = .433), which all showed an average viability of at least 99.95% and high average total nucleated cells (≥1.37 × 10 7 cells/mL). No significant differences in collected mass ( P = .433), cellular viability ( P = .880), or total nucleated cells ( P = .692) were observed between the 4 byproduct tissues. The byproduct tissues did exhibit significant differences in monocyte ( P = .037) and red blood cell ( P = .038) concentrations, specifically with greater values present in the ACL stump tissue. Cells from all byproduct tissues adhered to plastic cell culture flasks. Significant differences were found between colony‐forming unit fibroblast counts of the 4 byproduct tissues when plated at 10 6 ( P = .003) and 10 3 ( P = .016) cells as the initial seeding density. There was a significant relationship found between both the starting concentration (χ 2 = 32.7, P < .001) and the byproduct tissue type (χ 2 = 30.4, P < .001) to the presence of ≥80% confluency status at 10 days. Cells obtained from all 4 byproduct tissues qualitatively showed positive tri‐lineage (adipocyte, osteoblast, chondroblast) differentiation potential compared with negative controls under standardized in vitro differentiation conditions. Cells derived from all 4 byproduct tissues expressed cell‐surface antigens CD105+, CD73+, CD90+, CD45–, CD14–, and CD19– (>75%), and did not express CD45 (<10%). There were no statistically significant differences in cell‐surface antigens between the four byproduct tissues. Conclusions This descriptive laboratory study demonstrated that cells derived from arthroscopic byproduct tissues of ACL reconstruction remain viable when collected with an in‐line‐suction autologous tissue collector and these cells meet the ISCT criteria to qualify as mesenchymal stem cells. Clinical Relevance It is known that viable mesenchymal stem cells reside in byproduct tissue of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery (ACLR). Practical methods to harvest these cells at the point of care require further development. This study validates the use of an in‐line‐suction autologous tissue collector for the harvest of viable mesenchymal stem cells after ACLR.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».