Co-design of an integrated home-based primary care model for older adults living with frailty in Ontario, Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: The demand for home care is predicted to increase with increasing senior population and the aging-at-home phenomenon. Countries world-wide are preparing for this growing demand by making changes to their health care and social care systems. This change is much needed given that, globally, evidence shows that seniors are experiencing fragmented care particularly when they are living with frailty. To address this problem, the Central West Ontario Health Team in Canada is creating an integrated home-based primary care model for individuals 65+ who are living with frailty. At the ICIC23 Conference, I plan to share our research findings, design of the program, learnings from every phase of our co-design and change management approach, and findings from the evaluation of the pilot program. Methods: The program is being co-designed (using Experienced Based Co-Design) in collaboration with patients, caregivers, primary care, hospitals, the municipality, mental health organizations, social workers, home and community care, and other community groups. To date, the co-design team has worked together in partnership to share experiences, segment the population, conduct an environmental scan of documents, and conduct quantitative and qualitative research. First, the team performed descriptive data analysis of hospitalization and community data, and then, three separate focus groups were held with local organizations, service providers, and patients and caregivers (n=60). The data that emerged from the focus groups was then thematically analyzed. The co-design team is now finalizing the program as it is set to be piloted in January 2023, at which point, the program will be evaluated (on measures such as emergency department (ED) diversion and patient experience), updated, and scaled up appropriately. Results: Research showed that 80% of Alternate-Level-of-Care days in the Region are among those who are 65+. A cohort of the older adult population are also high users of the ED who are being discharged home each time. Reported reasons for high ED use include isolation, confusion about the health care system, caregiver burnout, and not receiving proper care in the community in a timely manner. Our research also identified frail older adults to be particularly vulnerable. The program I will describe in the presentation will aim to address these issues. It is novel to Ontario, Canada, and will consist of a screening process to identify “at risk” older adults presenting to the ED, a comprehensive assessment, and ongoing access to an intraprofessional team (consisting of physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, nutritionists, pharmacists, and mental health professionals) that will work together on a shared care plan for each patient. All the tools are being adapted to meet a multi-faceted definition of frailty as well as local needs given that the Central West Region is one of the most ethnically diverse regions in the province. By co-designing, the aim is to implement an integrated program that matches the preferences of patients and their family-members and caregivers. Discussion: The learnings will be helpful to the many groups world-wide who are also planning on creating integrated co-designed primary-care based programs for diverse older adults experiencing frailty.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».