MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4391040115 · doi:10.18174/642358

Field report passive fishing in offshore wind farm Borssele

2023· report· en· W4391040115 sur OpenAlexaff
S.M. Neitzel, Jorrit‐Jan Serraris, Pieter de Graeff, B. Deetman, Kees Taal

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typereport
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueMarine and Offshore Engineering Studies
Établissements canadiensImpact
Organismes subventionnairesRijkswaterstaatMinisterie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit
Mots-clésFishingOffshore wind powerDeskFisheryEnvironmental scienceSubmarine pipelineMarine engineeringGeographyEngineeringEnvironmental resource managementWind power

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This project developed a research outline together with commercial, small-scale fishers to test fishing methods that could be suitable for fishing in offshore wind farms, including their economic viability, ecological effects, and safety requirements.This is done so that (experimental) passive fishing in wind farms can be initiated.This was done in close collaboration with the fishers in a focus group.Previous to this study, a desk study was performed to collect all the knowledge and information present concerning passive fishing in relation to offshore wind (Neitzel et al. 2023).This knowledge was used to design the field tests for this study.This research investigates further possibilities of commercial passive fishing techniques when looking at operational factors, safety, fishing gear aspects, economic feasibility and ecology.This report describes what has been done in the practical (fieldwork) part of this study and gives a first impression of the lessons learned from the field.The data collected will be further analysed and presented in the final report that will be delivered at a later stage of this project.The operations took place in Borssele I and II offshore wind farm off the Dutch coast during the period April to October 2023.During the field experiments, a total of 35 days were conducted in the Borssele I and II offshore wind farm.The field experiments carried out in the project were as follows:• 5 days using gill nets with YE152.• 16 days using 4 different types of pots with YE152.• 4 days using handlines with KG7.• 10 days using a mechanical jigging system with MDV2.Prior to the experiments, the operational procedures were described in a document that included a Risk Assessment Method Statement and research outline (Plan van Aanpak) for each of the fishing gears.These procedures were aligned and confirmed by the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (LNV) and the Directorate-General for Public Works and Water Management (Rijkswaterstaat).The action plan was also shared with the wind farm owner of Borssele I and II, Ørsted.While the latter was not obligatory, it was helpful for coordinating activities and for safety measures during this project.Subsequently, field protocols were developed and shared with the respective skippers and crew of the involved vessels.The weather conditions during the spring, summer and fall period of 2023 have been unfavourable.The unfavourable conditions have limited the operability of the experiments.The experienced sea states are compared to long term statistics and do show lower operability in 2023.Furthermore, a statistical comparison is made of sea states in Borssele and upcoming wind parks (HKZ, HKN, HKW).This comparisonshows sea states will be worse in these upcoming wind parks.The experiences and collected data from the field experiments are currently being processed and analyzed.The final report, as agreed with LNV, will be delivered by the end of May 2024.The final report will provide further details on the practical feasibility of fishing in a wind farm, experiences with the chosen passive fishing methods for this project, the (environmental) effects, biological insights such as bycatch and the presence of birds and marine mammals during the use of the applied methods, and the economic viability of fishing in a wind farm.In addition to the final report, it was agreed that this field report would be prepared with the key findings related to procedures and safety aspects within a wind farm.Most of the field experiments were carried out as planned in the action plan, and there was no need for additional communication with Rijkswaterstaat, the coast guard, or the wind farm owner.However, during some field experiments, a few more or less unexpected events occurred, which were resolved during the course of the experiments.This did require extra time and effort in terms of communication, and it should be avoided in the future for fishers in their daily operations.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,025

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,280
Écart entre enseignants0,249 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetMarine and Offshore Engineering StudiesTravaux en français237 207