Field report passive fishing in offshore wind farm Borssele
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This project developed a research outline together with commercial, small-scale fishers to test fishing methods that could be suitable for fishing in offshore wind farms, including their economic viability, ecological effects, and safety requirements.This is done so that (experimental) passive fishing in wind farms can be initiated.This was done in close collaboration with the fishers in a focus group.Previous to this study, a desk study was performed to collect all the knowledge and information present concerning passive fishing in relation to offshore wind (Neitzel et al. 2023).This knowledge was used to design the field tests for this study.This research investigates further possibilities of commercial passive fishing techniques when looking at operational factors, safety, fishing gear aspects, economic feasibility and ecology.This report describes what has been done in the practical (fieldwork) part of this study and gives a first impression of the lessons learned from the field.The data collected will be further analysed and presented in the final report that will be delivered at a later stage of this project.The operations took place in Borssele I and II offshore wind farm off the Dutch coast during the period April to October 2023.During the field experiments, a total of 35 days were conducted in the Borssele I and II offshore wind farm.The field experiments carried out in the project were as follows:• 5 days using gill nets with YE152.• 16 days using 4 different types of pots with YE152.• 4 days using handlines with KG7.• 10 days using a mechanical jigging system with MDV2.Prior to the experiments, the operational procedures were described in a document that included a Risk Assessment Method Statement and research outline (Plan van Aanpak) for each of the fishing gears.These procedures were aligned and confirmed by the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (LNV) and the Directorate-General for Public Works and Water Management (Rijkswaterstaat).The action plan was also shared with the wind farm owner of Borssele I and II, Ørsted.While the latter was not obligatory, it was helpful for coordinating activities and for safety measures during this project.Subsequently, field protocols were developed and shared with the respective skippers and crew of the involved vessels.The weather conditions during the spring, summer and fall period of 2023 have been unfavourable.The unfavourable conditions have limited the operability of the experiments.The experienced sea states are compared to long term statistics and do show lower operability in 2023.Furthermore, a statistical comparison is made of sea states in Borssele and upcoming wind parks (HKZ, HKN, HKW).This comparisonshows sea states will be worse in these upcoming wind parks.The experiences and collected data from the field experiments are currently being processed and analyzed.The final report, as agreed with LNV, will be delivered by the end of May 2024.The final report will provide further details on the practical feasibility of fishing in a wind farm, experiences with the chosen passive fishing methods for this project, the (environmental) effects, biological insights such as bycatch and the presence of birds and marine mammals during the use of the applied methods, and the economic viability of fishing in a wind farm.In addition to the final report, it was agreed that this field report would be prepared with the key findings related to procedures and safety aspects within a wind farm.Most of the field experiments were carried out as planned in the action plan, and there was no need for additional communication with Rijkswaterstaat, the coast guard, or the wind farm owner.However, during some field experiments, a few more or less unexpected events occurred, which were resolved during the course of the experiments.This did require extra time and effort in terms of communication, and it should be avoided in the future for fishers in their daily operations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».