Theory‐Driven Perspectives on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Business and Management
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Shuang Ren, Riikka M. Sarala, Paul Hibbert The advent of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) has sparked both enthusiasm and anxiety as different stakeholders grapple with the potential to reshape the business and management landscape. This dynamic discourse extends beyond GAI itself to encompass closely related innovations that have existed for some time, for example, machine learning, thereby creating a collective anticipation of opportunities and dilemmas surrounding the transformative or disruptive capacities of these emerging technologies. Recently, ChatGPT's ability to access information from the web in real time marks a significant advancement with profound implications for businesses. This feature is argued to enhance the model's capacity to provide up-to-date, contextually relevant information, enabling more dynamic customer interactions. For businesses, this could mean improvements in areas like market analysis, trend tracking, customer service and real-time data-driven problem-solving. However, this also raises concerns about the accuracy and reliability of the information sourced, given the dynamic and sometimes unverified nature of web content. Additionally, real-time web access might complicate data privacy and security, as the boundaries of GAI interactions extend into the vast and diverse Internet landscape. These factors necessitate a careful and responsible approach to evaluating and using advanced GAI capabilities in business and management contexts. GAI is attracting much interest both in the academic and business practitioner literature. A quick search in Google Scholar, using the search terms ‘generative artificial intelligence’ and ‘business’ or ‘management’, yields approximately 1740 results. Within this extensive repository, scholars delve into diverse facets, exploring GAI's potential applications across various business and management functions, contemplating its implications for management educators and scrutinizing specific technological applications. Learned societies such as the British Academy of Management have also joined forces in leading the discussion on AI and digitalization in business and management academe. Meanwhile, practitioners and consultants alike (e.g. McKinsey & Company, PWC, World Economic Forum) have produced dedicated discussions, reports and forums to offer insights into the multifaceted impacts and considerations surrounding the integration of GAI in contemporary business and management practices. Table 1 illustrates some current applications of GAI as documented in the practitioner literature. Zalando [online platform for fashion and lifestyle] Instacart [e-commerce application] Salesforce [cloud-based customer relationship software provider] DHL [logistics provider] Coca-Cola [beverage company] Nestlé and Mondelez [confectionary] Heinz [food processing company] Air India [airline] Duolingo [language learning application] Mastercard [financial services] In an attempt to capture the new opportunities and challenges brought about by this technology and to hopefully find a way forward to guide research and practice, management journals have been swift to embrace the trend, introducing special issues on GAI. These issues aim to promote intellectual debate, for instance in relation to specific business disciplines (e.g. Benbya, Pachidi and Jarvenpaa, 2021) or organizational possibilities and pitfalls (Chalmers et al., 2023). However, amidst these commendable efforts that reflect a broad spectrum of perspectives, a critical examination of the burgeoning hype around GAI reveals a significant gap. Despite the proliferation of discussions from scholars, practitioners and the general public, the prevailing discourse is often speculative, lacking a robust theoretical foundation. This deficiency points to the challenges to existing theories in terms of their efficacy in explaining the unique demands created by GAI and indicates an urgent need for refining prior theories or even redeveloping new theories. There is a pressing need to move beyond the current wave of hype and explore the theoretical underpinnings of GAI and the dynamics of its potential impact, to ensure a more nuanced and informed discussion that can guide future research and application in this rapidly evolving area. In this direction, the British Journal of Management (BJM) invited prominent scholars who serve as editors in leading business and management journals to weigh in and contribute with their diverse theoretical knowledge to this symposium paper on the emerging GAI phenomenon. This collaborative effort aims to advance the theorization of business and management research in relation to the intricacies associated with the impact of GAI by engaging in intensive discussions on how theoretical attempts can be made to make sense of the myths and truths around GAI. The quest for theory, either seeking or refining, is a long-standing tradition in business and management research (e.g. Colquitt and Zapata-Phelan, 2007). While the seven pieces below place different elements under the spotlight of theoretical scrutiny, one common thread is the need to reconceptualize the relational realm of workplaces. The introduction of GAI in the workplace refines the norm of working together as a person-to-person group to working in a human–GAI group, with the latter illustrating three novel conceptual contributions in comparison to traditional understandings of the dynamics in the workplace. In the realm of the GAI-laden workplace, it is to from a to one that and the nature of by that future is to the the of the future and that GAI be as a and by and The a of the impacts of GAI The of to the future is points to a relational approach to creating the current and future in specific and and more the for the and as in the GAI-laden workplace. and the of the impact of GAI on the workplace, an approach The is an that can encompass the of of existing an examination of in with as as the of forces time (e.g. In the to that serve as a to move beyond of GAI and place it the intricacies of that contribute to its and future and a critical of how GAI into the of the to AI can be as a much as GAI GAI and in the way as In the of a human–GAI and provide their of using GAI in their for such as and the on GAI in by the potential of to the capabilities of with for and the of human–GAI forward by on the that a of new research in the human–GAI group both and In and contribute to about the nature of in the of GAI as human–GAI interactions a relational to knowledge in the of challenges the of knowledge and the nature of These issues more profound as the interactions and GAI can be either or In is to a and around GAI and its profound impact on business and management The diverse contributions in this symposium to offer serve as an on a of and in the The insights extend beyond the and existing management theories with by the of GAI. These discussions in and evolving theoretical to relevant in a business that could The discussions also extend to the and considerations of GAI in responsible and business and management practices. and practice, aims to provide and practitioners with insights and to the of GAI into their and in a and responsible In with this aims to contribute to a collective of knowledge that to and GAI also to the future of GAI in and and responsible The of is often a of insights to make sense of their also and that and thereby the by these in new and The of and from and from from and also There is in these to offer a and the of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) and its The of these is by the of and to the and of of the current with AI the capacity of the various and in advance need the new and The is This feature of AI for one of a an related to that on This ability collective and of knowledge that data to the even it is as is the with The is that the future is future from and to to their Despite the of of data points and the even and as This that AI be to the to and make as the in This is the in the and points to the of AI as a to of the and a for and The intelligence is how to be and explore is in different and explore is and AI be to areas and of can be to to make that the of data that for different about of to This is for one could from both and that the about the one AI is as one of the to of and as the the and the as it is that AI has in and it various of that on vast of by new of technology (e.g. of and how the AI to the is as a for of and from to one that for and These and be and for more that AI is both a to and a that is to be in the the in In this a more is to that AI itself is a and and their and be by For example, AI be of of that of the that and that is a as the a is and AI be in This be to to by a of also as who the ability to as that knowledge is The in the that contemporary both academic and also to and and a much as of data to new to by such data in novel by and data on the of the to the future and the AI even of data to that to explore is and could is much more in the future and the to AI be the with of with the to for a that to the and of it is to in terms of The is a much as it is a a or a a Google a search with a and by creating could be be a and it could This move from the to the from is to can is the of AI can this into is and for how AI and is to as this can and this it be more to the future to explore how to make sense of the future in the and potential thereby and the around the and the various attempt to serve more about about AI about collective and that and This to and to AI can and is for given that this is and have that beyond the of the as and to find it is a that GAI can contribute to the of the and the and the of has been with and This is even of various from in to in and also to that research also the these that academic journals 2023). from a be it a or a exploring to with the that have and the and and This has and theoretical In as much as the of the to and and the of a new this time even more the with and and and is even more with as these even more and to be the of a as as the of in the who the need for a of the that a the of the of the of of various of the need for sense of the relationship and new of informed be a of the this time related to the of AI in the For be a need to AI and how the and of AI with the of Recently, generative artificial intelligence (GAI) has been to by and with of on and as it with of et al., of that this is and have a and and the is for to these innovations and have to about GAI from a theoretical a and and to GAI the of its and the in it and GAI's by in areas information technology and and and and This that GAI's it is the of across various and this is the by and about it could mean for The of with to new like GAI can be by the that have been as of the of and their and a technology be a about how it for the concerns about how it 2023). like GAI often to of new existing of and and also often by challenges and concerns and the of a the with and generative in and of in that of that of and can of existing to the of new and the with about how societies and to the However, it is in a fashion that can the efficacy of such For example, by business has how of across a of technological and et al., illustrating the that to brought about by such The and associated with like GAI an in their and as as their the nature of such it is to also and the in new such as GAI in terms of the associated with the have and how in to provide theories and conceptual to exploring the integration of new in of both the technology in and illustrates and insights to to a technology like GAI can mean to The different associated with GAI with has in the The of the to that their the to the introduction of new to the that is to to the in of under that that with and be by a by that technology and traditional and make a new and the of the that technology and can in time to on more and and the about the that their and way of under from and a of the of new and on of the of in in the technology itself the general the in it is by of 2023). concerns have been made about GAI with its a as as such as the for in the technology 2023). The and in GAI is to in relation to the and made its and of its in of the of technological scholars, challenges to and the often with of In this to about GAI and its potential impact on business and management it is to that the a critical of how new innovations impact and by the societies place the the of in of new such as GAI provide a of their impact, in to for the to across the way in and to and For innovations in have to a working and the proliferation of et al., the and of data that can be together has also have the of with the introduction of to the of a much to as a of generative artificial intelligence to and be with to as as of customer service and information these can The of technology as a with to in has of and under can this GAI as a GAI in this a trend from technology as a that is to for a discussion of this in a and the and in et al., as to AI the of a and how AI or for real it to a AI a who for and can or or these that it be to and the way in from and a theoretical across the of that have been the management one is that to or more and and et al., the AI an et al., need to of a is one with an AI In need to how theoretical and that the of For in et of the has on the of the the of the and the in also et al., GAI is into organizational and it is to it to be this GAI be of the as an or is it for in the technological capabilities of the organizational The to this have implications both for research and for the way in the academic to and the to these this the of a the like of GAI's place theoretical also how this new of For example, is a in the of in is a of and has that (e.g. and the of in it the in a how and explore the of in it that in AI in the that their and how might this impact organizational and of it to to These documented in a of et al., et al., et al., research on GAI the management et al., 2023). is for management scholars to these as rapidly evolving and disruptive to the of the of the For example, could AI by their or from This could be in terms of in different an AI is given a or a or research and also be in an of the of insights into how GAI is into working and organizational and and it might be in the issues and the need to how human–GAI considerations by the introduction of GAI a in the of can with with their et al., et al., 2023). efforts to capture the and in the real have to the nuanced and that might the et al., 2023). For such as and across scholars have that of how with these and how might or to the and organizational impacts and The introduction of GAI serve to this in as the and et al., 2023). management scholars the that be to GAI in and be to from disciplines (e.g. This for the of from and with data from the that the of working the of of GAI in considerations be has been much about the of AI in organizational and management both scholars and practitioners and discourse with a on the implications for and software and a surrounding the of AI and et al., et al., 2023). Despite it that in the an such that it is as as and for the of a that is by GAI might be a the potential of such a could also be as a with of challenges This to how on and In the implications of GAI in it of to the potential for For challenges to make to in could be with the of AI and For example, an artificial with could a that some that have to and 2023). the and have been on and such in existing that et al., traditional software is by is on a that using of is some about how such a also in existing knowledge be issues to the of these et al., While to the current concerns that the of AI in by can and ability to make of and traditional with it about how this be and who be using how as might these into and research that a of stakeholders (e.g. of the public, technology a potential and to responsible and research into GAI management the management scholars need to engaging with the and of have unique and as of an to the and theoretical challenges that This that the of GAI in for management scholars is into the current and from There has been a of practitioner and academic on the of artificial intelligence and the and and and and have on how and technological and and have on the impact of AI on the to be that technological this current one and knowledge However, given the of has been to how AI theoretical of as a This is the new AI is to some and understandings the of the as a of knowledge and In this on this and reflect on how AI might the way of the of the of the is that is a specific is from such as and in the the a of the and of their the terms and under such is is by of and This is even in such as the of the the of This has been as an of associated with the and the of significant knowledge and of to in its in have a of and and a of and In these be to their or how these be be to the This is of the relationship a and their or a and their have been to this For in more and their be to capture and as to advance their et al., even in such have of and to that to and of in AI and related to as a by existing knowledge and information to the even these Table 1 three in the of AI in the in its of the or of it a the or that has on the of a technology for or have to a technology can of In Table have to about AI might be to in the as such as have significant and the of documented in Table is to and even and on data that often by in a and to be by (e.g. in service more by (e.g. in and as and of to on new technological and it to their or as to on more knowledge by that their knowledge into and and by and by of (e.g. into (e.g. of service (e.g. in service often in such as to and that and learning and and and by (e.g. in data to relevant of on how to of data that and opportunities for new (e.g. in in by ability of to machine learning and make some using on for about how to to the insights by to knowledge and and and their some the of their as this is machine learning as how to to from as in some and in areas who and these new machine learning provide a new that is to and (e.g. to more in need for management to ensure of (e.g. and leading to of some boundaries and challenges to of and generative artificial machine to provide and to (e.g. that on or offer to in and (e.g. that a to be to using by a service (e.g. to for of and of knowledge on the that from the relational of of as and who and provide and for of by and their of by (e.g. to and on ChatGPT's to as and to the more and that the of in with in how technology service on in technology and data The who and these of the service to and the of organizational that and by and to and the of under The common is to be technological that and and from to organizational by In more be to technological to for their the technology to research their or to their and as Table 1 in to and knowledge the that and the as from and of This that AI to existing theories and the of the Table as much as it reveals in relation to the of The capabilities of a of the of the of and and the of and how These in reflect and concerns in relation to the challenges and opportunities of generative AI in data intellectual or that have ChatGPT's might a of to be who to challenges to their and working to and the access to that from knowledge and This has itself in how have the of and Pachidi et al., 2021) or in that serve their and and also with a of have of the technological of been around for a time (e.g. also considerations beyond the and to the of is the of and in a a of potential to a a have the of using technology to the ability of to in in the by a from a it be with an or is that technology to also issues of and the of who be responsible in of or the by Table a of and how about and and this the of and and how this together a of and AI to and This be the of attempts to as a organizational in the AI The of the Journal of the of by the in illustrates how on and a how the the of a of from it in its as some of the in of the In to its the of the produced a also to a the of the The to an by the of contributions could be The current of and from this of and a The of the is it the relational that the of it and and it a a and a of that itself of emerging of of or both it this relational that the of that such the way to these the have and into by the of technologies. of these the one is generative artificial intelligence or its in like to in the of knowledge from and data to and is that the of and into a relational to knowledge to how knowledge be by on around and knowledge that of the thereby both the of knowledge and the nature of its The of in these could be a research with for as knowledge in relational with the that and their knowledge of relational and by to knowledge and as around in of and and illustrates how of in to academic knowledge relational from a of contributions to a of relational from and how the of an the collective into knowledge is by on a specific who for the This of and a of the is for and to ensure the have to be like research or or such as or and of For that journals such as that of the and more the of of academic research journals in the in the of management and the or the of These and the relational by knowledge and and by is data and produced from such This introduction of into the of management research the vast from and For example, the of on vast and data to in much the and of produced from these from academic and in an across and in that creating knowledge that is to its and the of or on such as and by the of in a or to have in the as a of and and in to the need for an who and of the of the and that the about the of of and in in journals the of and and and as to with a to how about research that their to the academic even more as the from a across different the of editors for on and or to new knowledge with the of a and of could The of and also a real of could an of on their The on of academic have implications for the of This is the for the the of academic is by However, it also the of academic and to the that these from with and as to who or has the This of is by of research the as that an of in that one even their can on data that and new data in with and often that also (e.g. in the of and the and of this vast of and current by is to for in such given such and The is one of and from a relational it also into an and a for knowledge and that in a knowledge have a to is on in the of knowledge is knowledge is and by a of interactions that and on of and and 2023). AI as in new of new of a or of in the with and about the the of responsible one of and discussion and and 2023). the that have been for be like the of of this has it been how can it and who can it for the in it is for can these various a of concerns around GAI and points that be and in much is is knowledge around of and these both the knowledge and the is to a technology that to these relational to the of knowledge and its the has its relational and a its reflect and this be with and on a the that it its
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle