MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4391053161 · doi:10.1111/aos.16633

The usefulness of routine photography in a myopic patient treated for glaucoma: 36‐year follow‐up

2024· letter· en· W4391053161 sur OpenAlexaff
Anja Tuulonen, Tae‐Woo Kim, Balwantray C. Chauhan, Claude F. Burgoyne, Ville Saarela, Hannele Uusitalo‐Järvinen

Notice bibliographique

RevueActa Ophthalmologica · 2024
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Établissements canadiensDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesBusiness Finland
Mots-clésMedicineGlaucomaDioptreOphthalmologyOptic discOptic nerveOptic diskOptometryVisual acuity

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In 1960 when the patient was 22 years old, she had been diagnosed in Helsinki with pigmentary glaucoma (Krukenberg spindle without iris transillumination) after a positive water drinking test and had been treated with pilocarpine until 1979. In 1980–1986, the patient had been followed without treatment in two other towns in Finland at 6-month intervals. Thereafter, the patient moved to the Oulu area where she has been cared for by ophthalmologists in both public and private sectors. At the University Hospital, Oulu, routine black-and-white photography of the optic nerve head (ONH) and retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) for the diagnosis and follow-up of glaucoma were introduced by Professor Henrik Forsius and photographer Heikki Nieminen in the early 1970s. Based on progressive ONH changes in 1986–1993, treatment was re-started. The highest IOP up to 30 mmHg was measured on treatment in 1995. The patient was followed in Tays Eye Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Finland, in 2013–18, and thereafter in Oulu. She has no family history of glaucoma, has been treated for systemic hypertension since 2009 and was diagnosed with atrial fibrillation and hyperthyroidism in September 2020. In 1986, the patient's refraction was −1.75D (dioptre), cyl (cylinder) +0.75D axe (axis) 100° in the right eye (RE) and −5.0D, cyl +0.75D axe 80° in the left eye (LE). In addition to slow long-term progression detected in the ONH as well as optic disc haemorrhages in both eyes, the patient developed nuclear and posterior pole cataracts. She had cataract surgeries in both eyes in 2003 with preoperative refractions of −3.75D (RE) and −7.5D (LE). The one-month postoperative refractions were −0.25 D in both eyes. The latest refractions were −0.75D, cyl +0.75D axe 70° (RE) and −2.25D, cyl +0.5D axe 140° (LE) with Snellen visual acuities of 0.9 and 1.0, respectively. At the time of the cataract surgeries in 2003, the axial lengths were 25.4 mm (RE) and 27.2 mm (LE). In 1991, the axial lengths of 24.8 mm (RE) and 26.8 mm (LE) were measured for manual planimetry with disc sizes of 2.5 mm2 in RE and 2.4 mm2 LE. The neuroretinal rim areas were 1.3 mm2 and 1.5 mm2, respectively. When comparing digital ONH photographs to the first paper prints taken in 1986 in Oulu, they looked dramatically so different and therefore raised a doubt about whether the photographs had been taken from the same patient. However, organizing the pictures in chronological order revealed uncommon longitudinal ONH and peripapillary changes in both eyes during the 36-year follow-up (Figure 1a,b). Changes in the photographs of both eyes taken in 1986–2000 had been interpreted as glaucomatous progression in the upper and lower parts of the ONH, as indicated by the increased bending of the vessels towards the clinical disc margin. However, the subsequent images reveal that these changes actually continued further into profound progressive peripapillary scleral bowings, that is, bending of vessels along the cupping outside the disc margins in both eyes (Figure 1a,b). No patient charts had reported on the shifting of these changes outside the disc margins over the years. In the more myopic LE, optic disc shape appeared to change from circular to vertically oval configuration, as reported to be common in highly myopic eyes (Jonas et al., 2020). In the right eye, in spite of significant long-term changes in and around the ONH, the overall neuroretinal rim in the first and latest photographs look remarkably similar. While the early RNFL photographs were informative, for example, showing normal RNFL in the paper prints in 1986, the progressive myopia reduced the visibility of the RNFL hampering its evaluation later on (Figure 2). Figure 3 of the right eye, using Enhanced Depth Imaging (EDI) with optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) (Spaide et al., 2008) demonstrates how the ONH has sunk posteriorly into peripapillary staphyloma. The scleral changes appear to be the main cause of the peripapillary deformation resulting in the intrachoroidal cavitation (Ehongo et al., 2023), also known as choroidal schisis around the termination of Bruch's Membrane Opening. Figure 4 presents an overview of the patient's clinical data: intraocular pressure, treatments, disc haemorrhages, procedures, mean deviation of visual fields and Snellen visual acuity. In conclusion, this essay demonstrates that routine photographic documentation of the fundus stands the test of time and promotes the continuous development of both clinical skills and deep learning algorithms. All authors fulfil all four criteria for authorship by International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). The study was supported by the Competitive Research Funding of the Pirkanmaa Wellbeing Services County (grant no. 21519). The governmental organization Business Finland (1346/31/2019) supported Tays Eye Centre to bid the development of tailormade real-world data collection and analysis tool package in collaboration with all university eye clinics in Finland (Figure 4). The bid was won by Optomed Plc, Finland.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,100
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,263
Écart entre enseignants0,236 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueActa OphthalmologicaMême sujetGlaucoma and retinal disordersTravaux en français237 207