The Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Primary Healthcare Physicians in the Al Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia Regarding Travel Medicine: A Cross-Sectional Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background and objective In the age of globalization, diseases associated with travel have emerged as a focal point of public health interest. This has become particularly relevant in Saudi Arabia after the changes in tourism policy in recent years. Primary care physicians are expected to suspect diseases of importance in certain geographic areas. They should dispense pre- and post-travel advice. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of primary care physicians in the Al Qassim region, Saudi Arabia regarding travel medicine. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Al Qassim region, Saudi Arabia between October and November 2023. We reached out to all primary care physicians in the region regardless of their gender, nationality, and years of experience. The data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire, which was designed based on the available literature and validated by experts. Results A total of 197 physicians participated in the study; 74% were male, 46% were general practitioners, and 48% had 5-10 years of experience. More than half (51%) of the participants reported a weekly patient load of 50-100, while 47% engaged with 5-10 travelers annually; 53% provided travel health advice and a quarter of primary healthcare physicians never attended travel update sessions or conferences. In the last six months, 48% and 43% of the physicians conducted pre- and post-travel consultations respectively. Approximately 49.2% demonstrated a fair knowledge of the topic. Factors associated with fair knowledge included non-Saudi nationality, age below 30 years, minimal traveler exposure, and infrequent conference attendance (p<0.05). A positive attitude was linked to being under 30 years old, having <5 years of experience, seeing <5 travelers yearly, and possessing a fair knowledge of the topic (p<0.05). Conclusions Overall, about half of the physicians in the Al Qassim region engage with travelers and demonstrate good attitudes and practices toward travel medicine. Opening Saudi borders to tourism necessitates the inclusion of travel medicine in continuing medical education programs to prepare primary care physicians to care for travelers more efficiently.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».