Improving the Timing of Acute Care Insulin Delivery
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
LOCAL PROBLEM: Variations in nursing practice were observed across our hospital, a 520-bed acute care teaching facility in the northeast United States, regarding the timing and frequency of insulin administration in adult patients with diabetes. Chart audits noted that RNs administered insulin more than one hour after blood glucose results were obtained 97% of the time. In addition, insulin was given at bedtime only 37% of the time. PURPOSE: The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project was to improve the care of inpatients requiring insulin by implementing protocols and adjusting practice to align with best practice recommendations. METHODS: The clinical nurse education specialist met with a team of staff nurses, providers, nurse leaders, and patient care technicians (PCTs) to formulate protocols and design interventions to ensure improvements in the quality of care for inpatients with diabetes. A sequence of education sessions and an online learning module were developed and assigned to nurses and PCTs to address knowledge gaps, specifically in the pharmacodynamics and safe administration of insulin, as well as how best to provide care to patients with diabetes. Monthly adherence data were disseminated to nurse leaders and educators and reviewed with clinical staff at daily safety huddles and staff meetings. Additional interventions to enhance nursing practice in caring for patients with diabetes included ensuring both bedtime insulin administration and timely insulin delivery. This project began in May 2017 and ended five years later. RESULTS: Two weeks after initial education sessions began in May and June 2017, the frequency of giving bedtime insulin based on the order set and according to the patient's blood glucose levels rose from 37% to 82%, and adherence to best practice protocols continued until final chart audits were performed in May 2022. The frequency of giving insulin less than one hour after obtaining blood glucose results improved from 3% to 64% between October and December 2019, and increased to a sustained level above the project's 92% goal two years later. CONCLUSION: Protocol development, targeted education, and audits with feedback led to improved care delivery for patients requiring insulin and increased nursing confidence.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».