The Influence of Structuralism on the Formation of Contemporary Ukrainian Plastic Art
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The article examines the influence of structuralism on the formation of plastic art in Ukraine in the second half of the 20th and early 21st centuries. First of all, we are talking about the creativity of the artists working in the field of fine and decorative arts and using wood as a material. It was outlined the defining principles of structuralism based on the works of contemporary researchers. Various structuralist approaches in cultural studies, philosophy and art are considered. For a deeper understanding of the nature of the Ukrainian plastic art the prerequisites for the development of structuralism in the visual arts on the basis of C. Monet's creative revolution and P. Cézanne's deep structural study of nature through geometry have been determined. The importance of P. Mondrian's creative experiments and the concept of neoplasticism introduced by him has been emphasized. The structuralist manifestos of C. Biederman, E. Bornstein and E. Wilmott have been analyzed. The creative method of structural reliefs of the Canadian artist of Ukrainian origin R. Kostyniuk, his inspirations and his own concepts of constructed compositions based on geometric shapes have been studied. In contrast to regular mechanical units and new technical material, the structural sculptures of E. Zelenak revealed the use of biomorphic forms built on the basis of repeating modules. D. Samil's constructed canvases of folded bright planes are mentioned. The article demonstrates the importance of the phenomenon of nonconformism in the Ukrainian artistic environment. Certain peculiarities of the application of theoretical developments in the figurative and plastic author's models of contemporary Ukrainian artists have been highlighted. A number of artistic interpretations and stylistic features in the formation of plastic art in Ukraine in the second half of the 20th and early 21st centuries have been revealed. The works of Ukrainian and diaspora artists who worked and continue to work in the second half of the 20th and early 21st centuries in Ukraine and abroad, namely R. Kostyniuk, E. Zelenak, D. Samyla, S. Savchenko, I. Stefiuk, V. Andrushko, Y. Titenkov, N. Symotiuk, D. Shavala, A. Savchuk, and I. Solovyov, have been considered. The research objective is to identify and investigate the influence of structuralism on the formation of contemporary Ukrainian plastic art, as well as to analyze the works of artists who used the structural method in their works. Research methodology. The methods of observation, comparison, analogy, experiment, formal analysis and synthesis have been used. Relevance and scientific novelty. In Ukrainian art history, the concept of "structuralism" in three-dimensional structures, sculpture, and plastic art remains poorly understood and requires a deeper study of the connections between the artist's intentions, materials, as well as the historical and cultural context in which the artwork has been created. The research of the influence of structuralism on contemporary Ukrainian sculpture and other forms of plastic art, which are formed on such basic principles of the structural method as code, sign, structure, symbol, and color, reveals a new critical approach to the interpretation of creative experiments as an identifier of a completely new artistic paradigm.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».