MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4391278211 · doi:10.1353/crc.2023.a918299

Acting Like a White Woman: Cynthia Jele’s Black South African Chick Lit Novel Happiness Is a Four-Letter Word (2010) as New Weltliteratur

2023· article· en· W4391278211 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sandra Folie

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian review of comparative literature · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSouth African History and Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHappinessWhite (mutation)ArtWord (group theory)LiteratureArt historyPsychologyPhilosophyLinguisticsSocial psychologyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Acting Like a White Woman: Cynthia Jele’s Black South African Chick Lit Novel Happiness Is a Four-Letter Word (2010) as New Weltliteratur Sandra Folie Chick lit purportedly originated in the mid-1990s with works such as Helen Fielding’s Bridget Jones’s Diary and Candace Bushnell’s Sex and the City (both 1996). Initially defined as a new subgenre of romance, chick lit also departed from some well-established conventions of the romance genre, such as the single-minded focus on the search for true love and the one-man-per-woman ratio. Instead, the often ironic and humorous novels typically focus on more emancipated, metropolitan heroines—heterosexual, affluent, and (notably) white—who face the everyday challenges of their careers and the search for Mr. Right along with their friends. Early reactions to chick lit were often extreme, either attracting “the unquestioning adoration of fans” or “the unmitigated disdain of critics” (Ferriss and Young 1). The rejection or omission of the genre by critics and literary scholars ensured that chick lit and world literature are hardly ever associated with one another to this day—except, perhaps, with some degree of irony, as in Rachel Donadio’s article in the New York Times, “The Chick-Lit Pandemic” (2006). In the context of both increasing indictments of a sexist book industry and the COVID-19 pandemic, Donadio’s disease metaphor has not aged particularly well. Pointing to the genre’s ‘minor’ reputation and ‘major’ circulation, the metaphor is also unfortunate because it suggests that chick lit has been transferred from the white Western ‘centres,’ mainly the US and the UK, to the ‘peripheries,’ where “an international commuter train of women has been gathering speed close behind. From [End Page 34] Mumbai to Milan, Gdansk to Jakarta […].” This notion of chick lit as a successful export product is reminiscent of Franco Moretti’s infamous “law of literary evolution.” The pattern he describes in relation to the modern novel—that “in cultures that belong to the periphery of the literary system,” it “first arises not as an autonomous development but as a compromise between a western formal influence (usually French or English) and local materials” (58)—has also dominated chick lit research until recently.1 When Donadio concludes her article with a quote from Helen Fielding that “the really interesting thing […] would be to see chick lit coming out of Africa,” she is effectively marking the African continent, along with the Arab world mentioned shortly thereafter, as the tail end of chick lit evolution. Headlines such as “Where’s the African Chick-Lit?” (Abrams) or “Is there a chick-lit gap in African literature?” (Owino) seemed to reinforce that notion almost ten years later. Rather than simply confirming an existing ‘deficit,’ however, these articles put it in perspective by pointing out that chick lit novels are offered in large numbers on the streets of African metropolises and that the genre is also explored “in monthly magazines and weekly newspaper pullouts” (Owino). Considering that only a fraction of the literary production from Africa reaches the Global North, ignorance of African chick lit is not surprising. ‘Western’ readers and critics often have very specific expectations of African literature, which is assumed to be explicitly political and to revolve around slavery, colonialism, poverty, and war— usually in the form of novels or memoirs. This points to “a dominant white reader’s gaze that desires to consume black suffering” and that results in Black African writers “being unfairly pressured toward a single story” (Samatar). Moreover, chick lit had a bad reputation in Africa for supposedly being “superficial or materialistic” and for focusing on “stories of white women with western white woman problems” (Rouse). The fact that only a few months after the publication of Donadio’s article on the chick lit pandemic, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s short story “The Thing Around Your Neck” appeared in a volume titled This Is Not Chick Lit suggests that African authors may deliberately distance themselves from the genre. The NGO Femrite–Uganda Women Writers’ Association, for example, also refrained from promoting their ‘romantic’ women’s fiction as chick lit. Other publishers, however, did embrace the label. Some of them, such...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,583
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,050
Tête enseignante GPT0,296
Écart entre enseignants0,245 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian review of comparative literatureMême sujetSouth African History and CultureTravaux en français237 207