Notice bibliographique
Résumé
B oth the content and authorship in this special edition provide us with a glimpse of a new era of Convict Criminology, what I refer to as Convict Criminology 3.0.In its infancy, Convict Criminology refl ected the exclusionary practices that are endemic in academia.This early era refl ects what I consider Convict Criminology 1.0 (1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008).Early membership was comprised largely of white men who had access to higher education, which refl ected academia's status as a predominately white male institution.While the informal Convict Criminology that emerged in the 1990s sought to amplify the voices and lived experiences of formerly incarcerated persons (Ross & Vianello, 2021), the membership did not refl ect the reality that incarceration disproportionately impacts lower-income individuals from communities of color.Moreover, the female voice was nearly nonexistent within the subfi eld's existing literature (Cox & Malkin, 2023).After 'the fi rst dime' (Jones et al., 2009), Convict Criminology expanded internationally and increased its presence within criminology, culminating in the establishment of a formal American Society of Criminology (ASC) division.I refer to this era as Convict Criminology 2.0 (2009 to 2019).The fi rst 25 years of Convict Criminology was an era of refl ection and growth.Today, Convict Criminology has entered a period of rebirth.This special edition marks a departure from the historical exclusivity that existed within the fi rst 25 years of Convict Criminology.While the narratives of men who served prison sentences dominated the fi rst 25 years, the next 25 years have the opportunity to provide a more intersectional and progressive view of life experiences within the criminal injustice system.Most notably, this special edition does not merely include one or two articles by women, the voices of system-impacted women dominate this edition.Moreover, the authors include people with direct experience and familial experiences with incarceration, which off ers a more complex view of the impact of the criminal injustice system.The articles in this special edition also off er a wide range of topics, provide both theoretical and empirical arguments and utilize both qualitative and quantitative methods.This special edition should be viewed as the fi rst step towards a Convict Criminology for the future.The progress refl ected in this special edition is indicative of larger shifts within Convict Criminology.The formal Division of Convict Criminology (DCC) is comprised of scholars from diverse backgrounds, experiences, genders, ages, and races.Our membership consists of individuals who
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».