Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The aim of my paper is to introduce a few "Japanese" writers as representatives of a different "Japaneseness," one in which Europe is not only a cultural referent but also a relevant part of their identity.In doing so, I hope to contribute to a possible answer to the unsettled question of what makes a writer a Japanese writer: I shall consider it from the perspective of whether it is someone born in Japan, someone who writes in Japanese, someone who shares in the Japanese cultural and emotional world, and other such issues.The first Japanese author writing in a European language who would probably leap to eve1yone's mind is Kazuo Ishiguro.It is difficult to consider him representative, however: if not an English writer, he is more a migrant than a Japanese.'His links with Japan have faded, and his imaginative world is far more European than Japanese.I intend to start my discussion, then, with a writer who sums up all of the above distinctive features: Tawada Yoko (born in Tokyo, 1960).She is now well-known all over the world, as her work reaches Japanese-speaking and German-speaking readers; and she herself has visited various universities in North America, lecturing in Montreal and at Columbia, Tufts, Brown, and Amherst in 2006, and at Penn State in 2007.As a book about her work has also been published, I need not introduce her in any detai1.2 Among the many writings she has produced, she herself suggested that three of them might be of interest for the purpose of this paper 3 : Where Europe Begins (2002), a collection of stories for the most part originally written in German, Yogisha no yakO ressha (Suspects on Board a Night Train, 2002) and Ekusofonf: bogo no solo e deru tabi (Exophonie: Leaving My Mother Tongue, 2003).4 Yogisha no yako ressha consists of 13 chapters, each narrating a trip to a different town in a different count1y, as well as the emotions and thoughts of the narrator.The theme of different languages and cultures underlies the whole work: nevertheless, it is difficult to extract any one passage which specifically focuses on the issue.One of the more significant is to be found in the last chapter, "Bound to a Nowhere Town" (Dokodemonai machi e): "Here, we are on board.There are people talking in variety of ways.Those who cannot [bear to] listen to the talk of others had better get off." 5 More than illustrating a personal choice of 1 Such writers also include Fujimori Asuka (born in Tokyo, 1978), who writes in French, although her novels are much more "Japanese" in theme and atmosphere.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».