MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4391442291 · doi:10.1111/cag.12900

Of Black Study By JoshuaMyers, London: Pluto Press. 2023. 288 pages. $35.60 (paperback). ISBN: 9780745344126

2024· article· en· W4391442291 sur OpenAlexaffvenue
Tolulope Awobusuyi

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueRace, History, and American Society
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Waterloo
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPlutoAstrobiologyPhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

What should we make of Black Study, its purpose, its technologies, its institutions, its multiple meanings? Is it the study of Black peoples, Black place, Black meaning? Or is it the study of racism, Blackness as otherness, Blackness as opposite to the workings of capitalism and white supremacy? Or, as Christina Sharpe (2016) puts it, is it the unceasing hold of the slave ship as formative trauma and its variegated afterlives? For Joshua Myers, Black Study is about all these things. It is also, primarily, about history: the history of ideas and their boundaries, their propagations and form-giving powers to the worlds and institutions made in their aftermath, as well as the work Blackness does in the contemporary academia. At the core of this work are the numerous ways Black Study critiques Western modes of knowledge production and a critique of Black Study as it is currently constituted in academia: as a deflection against alternative forms of knowing and being, as a tool of hegemony, and as dilatory of the more radical aspects of Black intellectual production. Myers brings this critique to the heart of the social sciences and humanities in a forceful, sustained practice of clarification, cutting through the propaganda and mystique that academia builds around itself, to show not only how academia is structured and given meaning by wider political influences, but also how these influences are in turn reified by academic practices and appeals to neutrality. These critiques are not new, but what Myers has given us in this book is the rarest of things: a re-membering of the purpose and history of Blackness as intellectual life, a call to arms, and a beautiful example of what it means to write Black. Theory and history merge, moving from the personal experiences of its intellectual heavyweights to wider critiques on the nature of law, order, and social sciences as the site of reproduction of racial hierarchies and schemas, rendering this a multiplicity of experiences in readily accessible language. Readable and dense with Black intellectual history, this book is destined to become a staple of introductory courses to Black Studies at the graduate level and an essential resource to research in the field. Enough about what the book is, then. What drives this text to such heights, and such depths? Conflict, for one thing. Haunting. Doublespeak. Madness, even. In this book, things are said once but twice heard, through reverberations. This begins at the level of its structure. The book takes the form of six chapters, each tied to a Black intellectual of note (June Jordan, W. E. B. Du Bois, Sylvia Wynter, Jacob Carruthers, Cedric Robinson, Toni Cade Bambara), and purports to give a somewhat chronological account of the origins of the field, its intellectual embeddedness, conflicts with the wider strictures of academic practice, and the development of the radical traditions and breaks with the academy. Each main chapter is also related to a theme (e.g., hesitance, human, speech, order) central to the work of the intellectual studied, but Myers, in the tradition of the Black trickster gods (e.g., Eshu, Anansi), has allowed for hauntings to work through his text in ways that transform this into a truly Black work. Fred Moten's (2003) work on Black rupture haunts here, as does Africa as home, artefact, and Black fetish. Du Bois as the originary force of many fields in the humanities is thoroughly investigated, but Moten's (2003) practice of refusal and breaks stalks him through his conflicts with the academy and institutional Black studies. Audre Lorde's (1982) biomythography is a spectral presence to Myers's work, through her investigation of the roles of intellectual talents over and against daily struggles for existence and meaning in the enterprise of Black life. In Myers's writing, Wynter disturbs the dominance of African American discourse in Black study through feminist praxis, accurately pointing out the ways in which Blackness as an institutionalized discipline loses much of its force and power when centred around a single story. For Myers, Africa walks with Carruthers, as an intense labour of love and fetish, the fountain of knowledge that speaks and yet must be spoken for. Madness as Black opposition to Western forms of order troubles Robinson, driving him to Black radicalism as Myers recounts. Spectral geographies of Black haunting tie the book together as it moves amongst continents and ideas, promiscuous in its embrace of the ghosts and real bodies that make up Blackness. Religions make their case for a piece of the Black body and are rebuffed by Blackness's refusal to be a single being (again, see Moten). White supremacy appears as apex predator, death drive, eternal consumer, but Blackness—to read Myers's construction of it—is a ghostly god, infinitely shapeshifting and siring, conflicted, forever labile. Of Black Study is moving, haunting, changing. It says Blackness will never die. What's a predator to a ghost, after all?

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,141
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,472

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,003
Communication savante0,0050,013
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1410,050

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,224
Écart entre enseignants0,213 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes→Même sujetRace, History, and American Society→Travaux en français237 207→