Kingbird Highway: The Story of a Natural Obsession that Got a Little Out of Hand, by Kenn Kaufman [Review]
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The gestation period of a book is said to be longer than that of an elephant (up to 22 months).This book is another example; he wrote the first draft in 1975, resurrected it in 1990, obtained help from skilful editors, and finally published the hard-cover edition in 1997.Three years later it was re-issued as an inexpensive paperback, the subject of this review.Keen birders recognize Kaufman as one of the top authorities on bird identification.The first six chapters of Kingbird Highway tell how he got his start.In 1973, after completing high school in Wichita, Kansas, Kaufman determined that he would set a new North American record for the number of bird species seen in a year.Guy Emerson of the National Audubon Society had been the first; he identified 497 species in 1939, followed by Bob Smart with 510 species in 1952, Roger Tory Peterson (accompanied much of the way by James Fisher) with 572 in 1953, Stuart Keith with 598 in 1956, and Ted Parker with 626 in 1971.Kaufman determined to spend 1973 surpassing the Parker record; this quest occupies the last 20 chapters.To run up a large total for the United States and Canada, Kaufman had, like his predecessors, to crisscross North America from California to the Florida Keys, to Gambell Island off the western coast of Alaska.Unlike his predecessors, he made his trips by hitch-hiking.The previous year, 1972, had seen Richard Stallcup edge out Richard Webster, for the largest California-only list, 428 species to 427.Kaufman was aiming higher, for a United States and Canada list of 635 or 640.By 26 January he had ticked off his 200" species for the year, somewhat ahead of his expectations.Yet he was somewhat non-plussed two days later in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, to meet Floyd Murdoch, on an identical quest.Murdoch was researching the history of the National Wildlife Refuges, and in visiting each was certain to gain a large list.Now Kaufman had a competitor, not merely a number to surpass.Some destinations were for a specific purpose, such as San Juan island off the Washington coast, to see the Skylark.From there he went back to the Florida Keys.Who should be with him on a boat trip to the Dry Tortugas but Floyd Murdoch, whose year list by then was about 50 species behind Kaufman's 440.Kaufman shares with us the travails of hitchhiking, including days without food and being wet for several days in succession.He travelled light, but met some of the keenest birders on the continent, including Ted Parker and the author-artist, Roger Tory Peterson, guest speaker at the first-ever convention of the newly formed American Birding Association in Kenmare, North Dakota in June.Kaufman's year-to-date tally was 575.He then that Got a Little Out of Hand, by Kenn Kaufman [Review]."The Canadian
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».