Industry Hubs: Integrating Industry Perspectives in Design Education
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The Engineering Ideas Clinic at the University of Waterloo started in 2015 to expand the inclusion of real-world, hands-on design activities across the entire Faculty of Engineering. In the first stage of this development, the Ideas Clinic focused on adding formative design experiences in the form of Engineering Design Days. These activities are 2-day long design-build-test sprints where students work in teams to design solutions to discipline-specific problems. These first-year activities focus on building students' engineering design self-efficacy, and their knowledge of both the discipline, and of the process of designing. As we seek to expand our programming into second and third year, we have developed the concept of an "Industry Hub" as a way to deliberately incorporate the perspectives of industry in new activities. Including industry ensures that we are solving relevant problems and using tools/techniques/equipment that our students can expect to encounter in future careers in that domain. Furthermore, these hubs have shown to be an effective way to teach discipline specific skills in a relevant context, providing experiences to re-enforce abstract concepts. The Industry Hubs also serve as an avenue for emerging problems in industry to be explored. An Industry Hub consists of experts from one or more companies within a single engineering sector who consult with the Ideas Clinic. Internally to the university, the Ideas Clinic team consists of relevant course instructor(s), graduate students, and undergraduate students employed with the Ideas Clinic during their cooperative work terms. This combined team of both academia and industry collaboration work together to design and implement activities which are relevant to both the curriculum and to the industrial sector. In this paper, we describe the concept of the Industry Hub in detail and ground the concept in a case study of our most mature partnership: the Brock Solutions Industrial Automation Hub. The Brock Solutions Industrial Automation Hub has been operating for more than 2 years and has led to the development of learning activities with implementations in both first and fourth year to more than 500 students. Overall, students have found activities developed within the hub valuable to their development as engineers, relevant to their discipline, and they have been well received by students in both first and fourth year.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».