(122) Preservation of Sexual Function: 12-month Outcomes from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham Controlled Study Evaluating the Optilume BPH System, a Novel Drug Coated Balloon
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction Many front-line treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), such as medications and transurethral resection of the prostate, have well established negative effects on sexual function. New minimally invasive surgical therapy (MIST) for LUTS/BPH need to preserve sexual function to meet the needs of men. Data from the randomized controlled blinded study of the Optilume BPH System was analyzed to evaluate the sexual side effects of this novel treatment. Objective The PINNACLE study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham controlled study evaluating the Optilume BPH System. Optilume BPH is a novel MIST that combines mechanical dilation with delivery of paclitaxel for treatment of LUTS/BPH. The mechanical dilation with Optilume BPH achieves an anterior commissurotomy, while delivery of paclitaxel is intended to maintain luminal patency during healing, while preserving sexual function. Methods 148 subjects with symptomatic LUTS/BPH and a prostate size between 20-80 grams were randomized in a 2:1 fashion (Optilume to Sham) at 18 centers in the US and Canada. Follow-up is complete through 12-months. To evaluate the effect of the treatment on sexual function, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire to assess Ejaculatory Dysfunction (MSHQ-EjD) questionnaires were used. Questionnaires were administered at baseline and 3, 6, and 12-months post procedure, regardless of sexual activity at baseline. A sub-set of 15 non-randomized subjects treated with Optilume BPH underwent further testing for semen quality and measurement of the amount of paclitaxel found in semen post-treatment. Results The average IIEF-EF score at baseline was 15-16 for both arms, mild to moderate erectile dysfunction (Figure 1). Scores across all domains improved slightly from baseline through 12 months, indicating that treatment with the Optilume BPH device had no significant impact on perceived sexual function. This finding is consistent when looking at men who were sexually active at baseline (Figure 2). Ejaculatory function also showed slight improvement from baseline to 12 months in both the overall population and the subset of men who were sexually active at baseline (Figure 1, Figure 2). There is no appreciable change in ejaculation bother from baseline to 12-months in the overall population and the sexually active subset (Figure 1, Figure 2). Overall semen quality parameters did not change post-procedure (Table 1). A slight decrease in sperm concentration was noted post-treatment, although this decrease was not significant at the 3- and 6-month timepoints. Paclitaxel was detected in semen in the majority of subjects tested at 30 days and 3 months post-procedure. The paclitaxel concentration in semen steadily decreased over time, nearing the limit of quantitation of the method by 6 months post-procedure. Conclusions Treatment with Optilume BPH preserved erectile and ejaculatory function. IIEF and MSHQ-EjD scores were not different from control at any time point. New MISTs for LUTS/BPH need to preserve sexual function to meet the needs of men and Optilume appears to meet this objective. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Urotronic. Clarification: Industry initiated, executed and funded study. Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Urotronic.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».