Thermo-Mechanical Stability of Hydrocarbon-Based Pemion^® Proton Exchange Membranes

Considering the environmental concerns about the disposal of perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) membranes as well as the growing interest in higher temperature operability of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), non-fluorinated hydrocarbon-based proton exchange membranes (PEMs) with aromatic backbones have become an increasingly active area of research. Low reactant cross-over, tunable electrochemical properties, and differentiated chemistries and potentially safer and cost-reducing synthesis procedures, are additional favourable features of hydrocarbon-based PEMs for prospective use in PEMFCs [1]. Vulnerable linking units, however, are known to be the main disadvantages of these polymers in the oxidative environment of fuel cells. During PEMFC operation, destructive radical species such as hydroxyl (HO•) are produced, causing polymer degradation and thinning in the membrane [2]. Recently, sulfo-phenylated polyphenylenes (sPPPs) have shown outstanding oxidative stability due to a polymer backbone comprising only aryl-aryl bonds, with mitigated chemical degradation in ex-situ and in-situ durability studies [3, 4]. Another concern is regarding the thermo-mechanical stability of PEMs. Thus, a systematic thermo-mechanical stability study is required to confirm the potential of sPPP-based PEMs to replace conventional PFSAs, especially for high temperature PEMFC, i.e., 110-120 °C. The present research objective is to assess the thermo-mechanical stability of a commercial reinforced hydrocarbon-based PEM, Pemion ® (PF1-HLF8-15-X, 15 µm thick, reinforced), as well as a mechanically-reinforced PFSA-based reference membrane, across a wide range of temperature (30-120 °C) and relative humidity (RH) (10-90%) conditions that includes the crucial high temperature window of interest for future PEMFCs [6]. To this end, a comprehensive design of experiment yielded 19 tensile tests at various hygrothermal conditions with dynamic mechanical analyzer (DMA 850; TA Instruments) equipped with an external environmental chamber accessory (TA Instruments, RH Accessory). Important mechanical properties such as Young’s modulus, ultimate tensile stress, yield stress, maximum elongation at break, strain hardening, and modulus of resilience were extracted and discussed as well. Datapoints were fitted for empirical model development and mechanical properties were estimated for high temperature and RH conditions beyond the capability of the instrument. This method can be employed to assess if the mechanical properties of membrane materials can be retained at higher temperatures, regardless of polymer chemistry and type. Storage modulus and loss modulus were separately measured in a dynamic mode to observe the impact of temperature on the mechanical response of the hydrophobic backbone and hydrophilic ionic clusters, respectively. Overall, Pemion ® demonstrates tough tensile properties in the stress-strain tests due to its sterically encumbered polyphenylene backbone (Figure 1a), whereas the reference PFSA (Figure 1b) shows elastomer-like behavior with much lower Young’s modulus, yield stress, and strain hardening (slope of the curve in the plastic deformation region). Figure 1c-f show the main viscoelastic properties extracted from the tensile tests at room (30 °C, 50% RH) and high temperature fuel cell conditions (110 °C, 50% RH). The modulus of elasticity and strain hardening of Pemion ® membrane are almost temperature-independent, whereas these properties for the reinforced PFSA material undergo a significant decay at high-temperature ambience. Pemion ® maintains good yielding strength even at high temperature and RH conditions (110-120 °C and 80% RH). Nevertheless, small mechanical stress values as low as 1 MPa can cause spontaneous yielding in the PFSA reference material above 110 °C. The modulus of resilience for the reinforced PFSA is also predicted to be zero at elevated hygrothermal conditions (i.e., 90 °C and 70% RH). This is interpreted as an approach to the material’s glass transition condition, where it loses its mechanical integrity and therefore, is potentially unsuitable for higher temperature PEMFC operation. Moreover, the dynamic mechanical thermal analysis revealed that Pemion ® retains its robustness at hygrothermal ambience close to high-temperature PEMFCs, i.e., 110-120 °C and 40-50% RH, whereas the backbone of the PFSA material gradually loses its strength. Acknowledgements This project was financially supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Ionomr Innovations Inc, Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI), British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund (BCKDF), Western Economic Diversification Canada (WD), and Canada Research Chairs (CRC). References [1] S.H. Mirfarsi, M.J. Parnian, S. Rowshanzamir, E. Kjeang, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47 (2022) 13460-13489. [2] R. Singh, P. Sui, K. Wong, E. Kjeang, S. Knights, N. Djilali, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 165 (2018) F3328. [3] M. Adamski, N. Peressin, S. Holdcroft, Materials Advances, 2 (2021) 4966-5005. [4] M. Adamski, T.J. Skalski, B. Britton, T.J. Peckham, L. Metzler, S. Holdcroft, Angewandte Chemie, 129 (2017) 9186-9189. [5] U.S. Department of Energy, Fuel Cell Technical Team Roadmap U.S. Department of Energy, Fuel Cell Technical Team Roadmap (2017). Figure 1

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.