MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4391640232 · doi:10.1149/ma2023-023445mtgabs

Quantifying the Effects of Temperature and Depth of Discharge on Li-Ion Battery Heat Generation: An Assessment of Resistance Models for Accurate Thermal Behavior Prediction

2023· article· en· W4391640232 sur OpenAlexaff
Sagar Vashisht, Dibakar Rakshit, Satyam Panchal, Michael Fowler, Roydon Fraser

Notice bibliographique

RevueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Waterloo
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBattery (electricity)ThermalMaterials scienceIonHeat generationThermal resistanceNuclear engineeringEnvironmental scienceThermodynamicsChemistryEngineeringPhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Li-ion batteries (LiBs) are widely adopted in electric vehicles (EVs) owing to their superior properties, such as high energy density, low discharge rate, long lifespan, and lightweight construction. Since the battery pack is the sole energy source for an EV, its performance is critical for optimal vehicle operation. However, the battery's calendar life, cycle life, and overall performance are significantly affected by temperature variations. The Li-ion batteries used in EVs may encounter challenging working conditions, leading to thermal problems such as significant capacity and power loss. In contrast, thermal runaways can occur at temperatures above a specific threshold, leading to severe health deterioration and sometimes catastrophic safety hazards such as fires and explosions. As the temperature significantly impacts Li-ion batteries, a battery thermal management system that can efficiently dissipate heat is crucial to ensure the battery's optimal performance and longevity. Hence, it is crucial to develop accurate algorithms for battery thermal management systems to precisely and dynamically estimate the temperature dynamics of the batteries integrated within the battery pack. While experimental data can be used to estimate battery temperatures, the dynamic and diverse operating conditions of electric vehicles (EVs) present a significant challenge. Therefore, accurately predicting thermal response within batteries is critical. Various thermal models have been developed to predict the thermal behavior of batteries and quantify the amount of heat generated. The simplified thermal model only considers joule heating and reversible entropic heating. However, more accurate physics-based models consider reversible heat caused by the side reactions, heat generated by mass transport loss, and even mixing-induced heat. The amount of heat generated inside a Li-ion battery is determined by its equivalent internal resistance, open circuit voltage, and entropy change, which are in turn influenced by temperature and depth of discharge (DoD). To the best of the authors' knowledge, previous research on the heat generation of Li-ion batteries has been limited in some respects. Specifically, there has been little investigation into the combined impact of temperature and depth of discharge (DoD) across a wide temperature range. Most studies have been conducted under ambient temperature conditions, and only a few have focused on high temperatures within a narrow range with low discharge rates. Thus, this study aims to address the research gap regarding the impact of temperature and depth of discharge (DoD) on heat generation in Li-ion batteries by analyzing these parameters using a transient battery thermal model. The research intends to improve the accuracy and precision of battery thermal behavior prediction, which has broad implications for battery-powered applications. This study aims to evaluate the impact of different resistance models on heat generation in Li-ion batteries, explicitly comparing a constant resistance model with a model that considers resistance as a function of temperature and depth of discharge (DoD). Investigating the interdependent impact of battery temperature and DoD on heat generation is crucial to create an accurate battery thermal model with high fidelity. The current study uses a two-dimensional battery thermal model to comprehensively analyze thermal behavior of a LiFePO4-20Ah Li-ion pouch cell. In this research study, heat generation in a Li-ion battery is evaluated by estimating the internal resistance and entropic change obtained from experimentation. The energy equation is then solved using the finite difference method in MATLAB to obtain the transient thermal response of the battery. The developed transient electrothermal model is validated against experimental data under varying C rates to assess the accuracy and precision of the proposed model. The simulation results show that the thermal response obtained considering the effect of temperature and DoD on heat generation shows more accurate results than the constant resistance values. The thermal behavior of a LiFePO4 pouch cell, considering constant values for heat generation, has a maximum relative error of roughly 19.99% compared to experimental data at a 4C discharge rate. While this maximum relative error was reduced to 6.29% when considering the effect of temperature and DoD on heat generation. In the constant resistance model, more significant errors can be attributed to the fact that the resistance of a Li-ion battery varies with the depth of discharge (DoD). While the initial discharge phase of the battery exhibits minimal changes in resistance values, a substantial increase in resistance occurs during the final stages of discharge. This contrasts with the actual behavior of Li-ion batteries, which demonstrate significant variations in resistance values throughout the discharge process. Thus, coupling the effects of DoD and temperature on heat generation is necessary to accurately predict the thermal behavior of Li-ion battery. Figure 1

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,010

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,049
Tête enseignante GPT0,336
Écart entre enseignants0,287 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations31
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueECS Meeting AbstractsMême sujetAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchTravaux en français237 207