MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4391660461 · doi:10.1353/sew.2024.a919143

Good Grief: On The 2023 Booker Prize

2024· article· en· W4391660461 sur OpenAlex
Ryan Chapman

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œSewanee review · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueShort Stories in Global Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGriefPsychologyPsychoanalysisHistoryPsychotherapist

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Good Grief: On The 2023 Booker Prize Ryan Chapman (bio) A week after the 2022 Booker Prize award ceremony, Rishi Sunak became the first British Indian to be appointed Prime Minister. He was the third PM in as many months. This milestone received a shrugged acknowledgement from my Sri Lankan uncles back in Minnesota, whose enthusiasm for a statesman from the subcontinent was tempered by the Conservative Party’s hot streak of self-owns. For my part, I took umbrage at Sunak’s CV: Americans know that marrying an heiress (John Kerry, John McCain) and skipping through the Goldman-to-government turnstile (Hank Paulson, Steve Mnuchin) is our thing. Two months later, his boss’s youngest son Harry released a ghostwritten tell-all, breaking sales records for a memoir. It became the fastest-selling nonfiction title in the United Kingdom, and globally moved three million units in its first week alone. For comparison, only two Booker winners have scaled such capitalist heights: Hilary Mantel’s Wolf Hall and Yann Martel’s Life of Pi. And then in May, Harry’s dad finally got that callback. The coronation of King Charles III cost an estimated 100 million dollars—four [End Page 104] times his mum’s, even adjusted for inflation—with a guest list that included surprise monarchists like Nick Cave and Katy Perry. The peaked septuagenarian cosplayed himself into parody earnestly and glacially. Unfortunately, we never got Martin Amis’s take on the whole boondoggle: the writer passed away on May 19 and was knighted by the new king a month later. (Since posthumous knighthoods are verboten, Charles backdated Amis’s to May 18.) Amis would have appreciated being honored by the very man with whom he argued the 1989 fatwa against his friend Salman Rushdie; Charles did not rush to Sir Salman’s defense. Last year’s Booker went to Shehan Karunatilaka for The Seven Moons of Maali Almeida. Karunatilaka is the second Sri Lankan recipient, following Michael Ondaatje who won for The English Patient in 1992. (Even then, Ondaatje was named cowinner with Barry Unsworth, the author of Sacred Hunger.) Ondaatje’s novel is still beautiful and affecting. As is Anil’s Ghost, his consideration of the Sri Lankan civil war, which shares a setting with Maali Almeida and none of its tone. Karunatilaka’s win was heartening, and his globe-trotting press tour highly entertaining. The man gives good copy, both figuratively and literally—like Rushdie, he once worked in advertising. Tara K. Menon wrote in these pages that 2022 was a rare instance of the best shortlisted book winning the prize, a fact supported by anyone familiar with its history. Possession’s A. S. Byatt said, “I’ve won it and judged it and it’s a lottery.” Hilary Mantel, also a Booker judge and (two-time) recipient: “Even the most correct jury goes in for horsetrading and gamesmanship, and what emerges is a compromise.” Perhaps to dispel such charges, 2023 chair Esi Edugyan has boasted of the panel’s passion and comity. She might also be frustrating the oddsmakers with public statements like “There’s no such thing as a ‘Booker book’.” (Bettors initially favored Tan Twan Eng’s [End Page 105] The House of Doors, which didn’t make the shortlist.) The Booker judges are culled from across literature, academia, and pop culture. Edugyan, a twice-shortlisted Canadian novelist, is the author of Half-Blood Blues and Washington Black. She’s joined by the actors Robert Webb, who Americans may know from the cringe marathon Peep Show and the sketch comedy show That Mitchell and Webb Look, and Adjoa Andoh, who has performed with the Royal Shakespeare Company and narrated several audiobooks—but likely better known for her role in Bridgerton. This year’s panel is rounded out by Costa Award-winning poet Mary Jean Chan and Shakespeare scholar James Shapiro. The judges read over 160 books in seven months and winnow their personal favorites into the longlist. The shortlisted six are then read again, or three times by the day of final judgment. The closed-door talks have been historically nothing of the sort: jurists’ exit interviews are often conducted with a member...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,565
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,256
Écart entre enseignants0,228 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle