The Pushkin Project: Russia’s Favorite Writer, Modern Evolutionary Thought, and Teaching Inner‐City Youth by DavidBethea. Boston: Academic Studies Press, 2003, 206 pp. $24.95. ISBN 979‐8‐8871‐9202‐4
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This book is the story of an ambitious and proudly idealistic project, the Pushkin Summer Institute at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, a six-week residential program for high school students of Chicago-area minority communities.The program offers instructions in Russian language and culture with the focus on Pushkin.It prepares students for the demands of college life by developing critical thinking and writing skills, but its true aspiration is to recreate the atmosphere of Pushkin's Lyceum, or at least, "something approaching the Lyceum experience for today's kids in need" (p.17).The Lyceum's curriculum, based on the humanistic principles of the Enlightenment and taught by professors of talent and integrity, determined Pushkin's and his classmates' life paths.David Bethea and his team aim to provide kids from Chicago's Hermosa neighborhood with the same transformative experience.The parallel story, in the opening chapter, is the scientific grounding of the project's objectives in modern evolutionary thought because culture and biology share developmental processes and patterns.Bethea establishes similarities between a text and a cell as tightly structured autonomous units, in which the whole and its parts must interplay.Cultural and biological evolution-what deserves to survive-inform each other.Bethea considers Pushkin's texts "life lessons in light of evolutionary theory and practice" (p.134).Pushkin, thus, "is a unique artistic talent, one whose Russian/African heritage can inspire our students, but also, and no less important, he is a representative of a primate species, and species evolve" (p.128).Pushkin's works at the center of the curriculum are "The Shot, "The Station Master," The Blackamoor of Peter the Great, and "The Queen of Spades."Each excellent chapter gives a detailed background against which the stories should be read: the semiotics of the duel and of the card game, Pushkin's family history, and so on.There are close readings, and analysis of how Pushkin's language reveals the text's psychological and philosophical underpinnings.Each chapter focuses on the texts' relatability: contemporary students recognize in Pushkin's storylines the dilemmas they face in their own lives, such as the male competition and macho posturing of "The Shot," or the conflict between filial devotion and sexual attraction faced by Dunia in "The Station Master."The Blackamoor of Peter the Great is a perfect text to explore the intertwining of race, ethnicity, and group identities.This chapter provides a detailed story of Pushkin's ancestry and his family as the background for Pushkin's unfinished novel; the space between the real and the fictional is where Pushkin, and PSI students, ponder the issues of racial identity and mate choice.And, finally, reading "The Queen of Spade" prompts considerations of risk versus reward, and also of what matters more in terms of survival skills, acquiring wealth or building relationships.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».