A288 ALCOHOL RELAPSE AND ADVERSE OUTCOMES IN EARLY VERSUS ROUTINE LIVER TRANSPLANT FOR ALCOHOL-ASSOCIATED LIVER DISEASE IN THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Liver transplant is a life-saving treatment for patients with alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) resulting in decompensated cirrhosis or severe alcoholic hepatitis, significantly reducing mortality compared to supportive treatment. Despite its previous wide acceptance, there is a lack of strong evidence to justify a 6-month abstinence period. In 2019, BC Transplant policies were updated to allow liver transplant within 6-months of alcohol use in carefully selected patients with limited life expectancy and favorable multidisciplinary psychosocial assessment. Aims This study aims to assess alcohol relapse rates and adverse outcomes in patients who received an early liver transplant for ALD. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on all adult patients who underwent liver transplant in the province of British Columbia between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022. Follow up data was extracted until May 31, 2023. Patients were included if they had alcohol documented as a contributing factor to their liver disease prior to transplant. Early transplant was defined as alcohol abstinence of 179-days or less and routine transplant as 180-days or more. Alcohol use and time to alcohol use were determined by patient history, random biochemical testing, and health-care utilization for an alcohol-associated complication. Graft dysfunction or rejection resulting in a change in therapeutic management, noncompliance determined by clinician documentation, rehospitalization, and death were recorded as adverse events. Results 278 patients underwent liver transplant during the study period. 81 patients were classified as alcohol-related, and 15 received early transplant. The mean follow-up period was 20.5 months. Early transplant recipients were more likely to be younger (median 45 vs. 58 years, p = 0.003) and have a higher MELD score at the time of transplant (median 37 vs. 17, p ampersand:003C 0.001). There was no significant difference in post-transplant alcohol relapse (13 vs. 15%, hazard ratio = 0.78, 95% CI [0.17, 3.55], p = 0.74). Graft dysfunction was increased in patients who received early transplant (53 vs. 25%, relative risk = 2.17, 95% CI [1.15, 4.10]). There was no significant difference between rates of noncompliance (0 vs. 9%), rehospitalization (53 vs. 56%), or death (0 vs. 2%). Conclusions Alcohol relapse is similar between early and routine liver transplant. Graft dysfunction is increased in early transplant, although other adverse events including medication noncompliance, rehospitalization, and death are not significant different. These results are favorable for the continued use of early liver transplant for ALD, providing an effective treatment for ALD and significantly reducing mortality in patients with a limited life expectancy. Funding Agencies None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».