A265 BARRIERS TO DIETARY MODIFICATION IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE (IBD): A MIXED-METHODS ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT PERCEPTIONS
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Many patients living with IBD identify diet as a key factor in managing their disease, symptoms and general health, and many report implementing dietary restrictions in response to disease activity and symptoms. Despite increasing data on the role of diet, IBD patients face a variety of challenges that can compromise adherence to dietary recommendations in clinical practice. Aims To identify IBD patients’ perceptions regarding barriers to dietary modification and to understand their experiences and expectations of dietary advice from gastroenterologists (GI) or dietitians (RD). Methods A mixed-method qualitative data collection strategy with semi-structured focus group and individual one-on-one interviews moderated by a clinical psychologist over a web-based, video communication platform (Zoom). Adult IBD patients (between 18 to 75 years old) attending the McMaster University Medical Centre IBD Clinic were invited to join a focus group consisting of 2-6 individuals or a one-on-one interview. All participants were asked to complete a demographics survey (REDCap) before the session. Recorded audio files for all sessions were transcribed, de-identified and reviewed for accuracy by 2 reviewers with an independent adjudicator to resolve discrepancies followed by thematic analysis (NVIVO). Results Between May to December 2022 and May 2023, 38 of 90 invitees took part in 11 focus groups and 9 chose individual interviews. Most participants (mean age 42 years; 60% female) were Caucasian (87%); 42% had a self-reported history of mental health disorders. Mean IBD duration was 16 years (min-max: 0.5–44 years); 73% were in remission and 68% had Crohn’s disease. Thematic analysis identified 5 primary and 11 secondary barriers to dietary adoption (Table). Participants reported positive and negative experiences with dietary advice from GIs and RDs; expectations included GI referral to a specialist RD and integration of an RD into the health care team. Conclusions IBD patients report multiple, varied barriers to dietary adoption and identify a need for improved access to dietary advice and other resources, including integration of RDs into primary and IBD Clinic care teams. The identification of multiple, varied patient-reported barriers offers an opportunity to develop personalized dietary advice for IBD patients to enhance health, well-being and quality of life. Thematic map of barriers experienced by patients when adopting dietary modifications Funding Agencies Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute; Douglas Family
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle