A144 ZENKER’S PERORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY (Z-POEM) OUTCOMES IN TREATMENT OF ZENKER’S DIVERTICULUM: A RETROSPECTIVE CASE SERIES
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Zenker’s diverticulum (ZD) is an outpouching of tissue in an area of the posterior hypopharynx called the Killian triangle. ZD is associated with dysphagia, regurgitation, cough and recurrent aspirations. Open surgical repair has been the traditional treatment approach but has high morbidity (0-40%) and mortality (0-9.5%). Endoscopic intervention with septotomy is a less invasive approach with lower complications and shorter recovery times. However, technical success rates range between 56.4-100%, and recurrences occur in 0-32% of patients. Recent studies have shown promising results for peroral endoscopic myotomy treatment of ZD (Z-POEM), although data is limited. Aims In this first Canadian case series, we assess the safety and efficacy of Z-POEM, a novel approach for managing ZD. Methods This is a retrospective case series of all patients who underwent Z-POEM for ZD at Kingston Health Sciences center between July 2021-2023. Data collected included patient demographics, symptoms [Kothari Haber Score (KHS)] pre and post Z-POEM, ZD size and prior treatments. Technical outcomes were also analyzed including the procedure time and the Z-POEM Difficulty Score (ZPDS), which ranges from 0-3 based on maneuverability, fibrosis, and oozing. Clinical success was defined as complete or near-complete resolution of symptoms (i.e. KHS ampersand:003C2), and recurrence was defined as KHS of 3 or more. Lastly, we recorded adverse events and hospital length of stay. Results This case series included 9 patients (6 males and 3 females). The mean age ± standard deviation (SD) was 66.1 ± 10.64 years. One patient had two separate Z-POEM procedures and those were analyzed separately (total sample size = 10). The mean duration of symptoms before the procedure was 31.2 ± 10.12 months and the mean size of ZD was 2.25 ± 1.10 cm. Two patients had prior treatments before their Z-POEM procedure. The median preprocedural KHS was 6 (range 3-10) with dysphagia being the most commonly reported symptom in 80% of patients. In terms of technical outcomes, the mean procedural time was 32.3 ± 13.21 mins, and the median ZPDS score was 2. Most patients required 4-6 clips, with one patient requiring 11 clips for closure. No adverse events or periprocedural complications were reported. 9/10 patients (90%) were discharged one day after the procedure, and one patient required a longer stay (4 days) for observation. Clinical success was achieved in 8/10 patients (80%) of patients with a KHS score of 0 at mean 12 months follow-up. The remaining two patients (20%) had a KHS score of 3 at follow-up suggesting some persistent symptoms. Conclusions Z-POEM is safe and effective in management of ZD with high technical and clinical success rates in the short-term. Larger-scale studies are required to determine the long-term clinical efficacy of Z-POEM in treatment of ZD. Funding Agencies None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».