A310 CANADIAN GASTROENTEROLOGY RESIDENT ATTITUDES TOWARDS TREATING PATIENTS WITH DISORDERS OF GUT BRAIN INTERACTION
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Disorders of gut brain interaction (DGBI) are common in the Canadian population. Studies show DGBI represent 30% of new referrals to gastroenterology (GI) clinics. Despite this, evidence suggests that gastroenterologists experience challenges in providing care for these patients, with a recent study from the United States indicating that this discomfort may begin early in residency training. Aims Our aim was to determine Canadian GI resident attitudes towards treating patients with DGBI, with a focus on determining underlying causes and solutions for potential negative attitudes. Methods Gastroenterology residents participating in accredited adult GI training programs in Canada were invited to participate in an online 30-item survey. This was based on similar studies in the adjacent field of chronic pain and administered using RedCap. Recruitment occurred through email invites distributed to residency program directors and QR code links presented at national GI resident meetings over one year. Results In total, 42 residents participated in the survey. Most residents reported frequent exposure to DGBI. Although most residents felt confident at diagnosing DGBI, only few felt confident in managing them. The majority reported less enjoyment and personal reward at managing DGBI than other gastrointestinal diseases, finding them frustrating to treat and expressing concern regarding the uncertainty of the diagnosis and low likelihood of successful management. Residents believed that challenges in the treatment stemmed from the following: inadequate training, uncertainty regarding the severity of symptoms that were reported, co-existing psychiatric issues, a lack of clarity on therapy and inadequate time. Residents reported that senior residents and staff both expressed negative opinions about caring for those with DGBI, and felt that displeasure for managing patients with DGBI was pervasive in the GI community. Importantly, the majority of trainees believed it was important to formally learn about the physiological underpinnings of DGBI as well as their diagnosis and management. Furthermore, understanding the impact of DGBI on a patient’s quality of life was thought to be important. Conclusions This national survey demonstrates that Canadian GI trainees are less confident and less interested in providing care for those with DGBI due to a variety of factors including inadequate training and a potential hidden curriculum. Residents believe in the importance of education in this field. The results of this study will be used to develop educational experiences to ultimately improve the care of those with DGBI. Funding Agencies None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».