A70 INABILITY TO AMBULATE FOLLOWING COLONOSCOPY: AN UNEXPECTED COMPLICATION
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background The peroneal nerve innervates the lower extremities. Compression injury has been documented in the adult patients following the lithotomy position perioperatively, but has rarely been described in pediatric patients following colonoscopy. Aims To report a rare complication following colonoscopy and discuss possible aetiologies. Methods A chart review of a post-colonoscopy peroneal nerve injury in a pediatric patient was conducted along with a literature review. Results A 12 year old boy with ulcerative colitis underwent a colonoscopy for flare symptoms. He was in the left lateral decubitus position for 60 minutes. Immediately after the procedure, he experienced loss of sensation from the left knee to the plantar aspect of the foot, and left foot drop. He had no symptoms of weakness or paresthesia in the right lower extremity or the upper extremities. Prior to the procedure, he reported normal strength, function, and sensation of all extremities. He had no history of injury, joint inflammation or previous surgery affecting his left leg. He had no recent history of steroid use or systemic illness. Two months post procedure he had some symptom improvement and could independently ambulate. He had normal range of motion, strength, and sensation in the upper extremities and right lower extremity. His left leg had 4/5 strength on dorsiflexion and decreased pinprick and light touch sensation. He had difficulty with heel-toe walking. Reflexes were normal. Left leg X-ray and spine MRI were normal. Electrodiagnostic evaluation supported a left common peroneal nerve injury, predominantly demyelinating in nature with minimal axonal contribution, likely secondary to compression around the fibular head during the time of the colonoscopy. He showed full recovery and returned to baseline by 7 months. Conclusions Peroneal nerve injury post colonoscopy is very rare. A study focusing on pediatric colonoscopy found that 3 of 746 patients experienced postoperative neuropathies in their lower extremities. Procedure times were between 70-120 minutes. Presentations and recovery periods were variable, lasting several days to 3 months. The mechanisms of this injury are unclear and felt unlikely to be secondary to positioning alone. It is speculated that BMI, procedure length, frog leg position and position changes, as well as systemic inflammation may be contributory. Factors such as hypothermia, dehydration, hypotension, hypoxia, and electrolyte disturbances may further place patients at risk. Awareness of this rare event and potential modifiable risk factors is important. Funding Agencies None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».