MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4391881533 · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1375509

Editorial: New insights on the relationship between neuroplasticity, genetic endophenotypes, and psychiatric disorders throughout aging and in the elderly population

2024· editorial· en· W4391881533 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Felipe Kenji Sudo, Viola Oertel, Sanjeev Kumar, Gilberto Sousa Alves

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers in Psychiatry · 2024
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueCognitive Abilities and Testing
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEndophenotypeNeuroplasticityPopulationPsychologyPsychiatryPsychiatric geneticsClinical psychologyMedicineSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Cognition

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Beyond genetic predispositions, the notion that people’s illness profile and clinical outcomes may be driven by the degree of stress throughout their lifespan has become increasingly accepted. Allostatic load (AL), the wear and tear on organic systems due to chronic overactivity or inactivity of physiological processes in response to stress, has emerged as a popular concept to explain different phenotypes within groups with similar chronological ages(1). High AL has been linked to an array of clinical consequences consistently associated with aging, including metabolic diseases, neurodegenerative conditions, mood disorders, and mortality(2). However, the mechanisms underpinning the relationships between age-related changes and stress are still matter of debate. In this issue, authors sought to explore these shortcomings through different approaches. For instance, De Oliveira et al. investigated the impact of aging on neurophysiological reactions to acute stress, namely the startle reflex(3). In normal conditions, the startle reflex is reduced when the pulse is preceded by a weaker sensory stimulus (prepulse), characterizing the physiological phenomenon named “prepulse inhibition” (PPI). Previous evidence suggested that aging is associated with decreased startle reflex and increased startle latency(4). Moreover, a U-shaped function relationship was found between PPI and age(4). Given that other data indicated a positive correlation between PPI and cognitive performance in young adults(5), the authors hypothesized that PPI alterations could function as a biomarker of cognitive decline in normal aging. The results demonstrated a reduced PPI in healthy older subjects (n=14) in comparison with a younger group (n=14). Although no significant correlation was detected between PPI and scores in neuropsychological tasks in older participants, the study provides new insights into the aging-related brain changes affecting the sensorimotor functional integration. Other studies addressed the issue of cognitive changes in older subjects by analyzing the relationships across mood disorders, executive function deficits, and markers of neural dysfunction. Chu et al conducted a cross-sectional design in subjects with late-life depression (LLD, n=50) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD, n=50) and showed greater executive dysfunction in AD than in LLD, and greater accuracy of Trail Making Test A and B and Medial Temporal Atrophy (MTA) measurements to discriminate between these clinical groups(6). The study emphasizes the relevance of employing standard cognitive assessment tools to screen and detect dementia, which may be useful in the context of less economic resources, where advanced (CSF, blood) biomarkers are of high cost or not available(6). As for Ma et al., the topic was approached through a pilot randomized trial in a community of 28 individuals in Hong Kong investigating the impact of computerized cognitive training (CCT) on executive dysfunction of LLD subjects. The intervention included 2 sessions per week, one hour each, along 6 weeks and the experimental group reached significant improvement in global cognitive function assessed using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Correlations between Hamilton depression scale improvement and increase in BDNF levels were also reported. Although results are limited by its reduced sample size and small statistical power, findings may encourage upcoming investigations on the effect of CCT on mood and BDNF, possibly establishing this intervention as effective for cognition in LLD(7). Finally, stress related to medical conditions may also exert significant influence on mood states. In this perspective, Guo et al. analyzed the prevalence of depression and anxiety in adults who underwent dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) due to nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO)(8). This condition can cause epiphora, blurred vision, and dry eye, which have been related to mental health disorders. Consistently, the authors found a positive association among dry eye, anxiety, and depressive symptoms(8). The articles presented in this issue may add to our understanding on how cognitive and mood disorders through the life cycle could be prevented, diagnosed, or treated. Future studies about the role of stress and AL on age-related neural changes ought to be ignited by this evidence, providing important advances in the knowledge of the processes implicated in late life mental health disorders.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,023
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,078

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,020
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,002
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0050,004
Science ouverte0,0040,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0110,012
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0230,012

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,290
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrontiers in PsychiatryMême sujetCognitive Abilities and TestingTravaux en français237 207