A137 BALLOON-ASSISTED ENDOSCOPY FOR SMALL BOWEL BLEEDING – A REVIEW
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a potentially life-threatening medical emergency requiring immediate medical attention. Obscure GI bleeding (OGIB) Is defined as GI bleeding with no obvious culprit lesion found on initial upper or lower endoscopy. Further investigations are needed as 75% of those cases originate in the small bowel. The advent of small bowel endoscopy, consisting of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) and device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) has allowed clinicians to endoscopically visualize the entire GI tract and perform therapeutic interventions. These devices include balloon assisted endoscopy (BAE) and Spiral Endoscopy (SPE). Aims The objectives of this review are to analyze the definitions, etiologies, and risk factors of OGIB. Furthermore, we reviewed the diagnostic and therapeutic yields of DAE and its safety profile. Due to the adverse effects and recall of SPE, we only report here on BAE. Methods A literature review was conducted using PubMed and OvidSP (Medline) to identify articles on the use of VCE and DAE for OGIB. Keywords included a combination of gastrointestinal bleeding with occult, obscure, active and inactive, small bowel bleed, diagnostic yield, therapeutic yield, and rebleeding rate. The information was obtained via systematic review and meta-analysis, retrospective studies, and case reports. Results A total of 32 papers were reviewed. The most common causes of OGIB reported were vascular lesions (23-47%), inflammatory lesions (12-16%), and tumors (5-16%). The risk factors associated with OGIB include age, cardiac disease, liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease, and hereditary vascular diseases. The overall diagnostic and therapeutic yields of BAE in OGIB were 76.3% and 49.5%, respectively. Factors that increased the yield included performing an initial VCE (increase by 7%) and performing the procedure within the first 10 days after the initial bleeding episode (87.5%) as compared to after 10 days (11.1%). Recurrent bleeding can occur in up to 46% of patients. Risk factors for rebleeding include cirrhosis, overt bleeding symptoms, and presence of multiple vascular lesions. Associated adverse effects in DAE were minor in 9.1% of patients and severe in less than 2%. These include bleeding (0.8%), perforation (0.3%), and pancreatitis (0.3%). Conclusions OGIB is a challenging clinical entity. BAE now allows clinicians to diagnose and treat culprit lesions in the small bowel with reasonable success and a strong safety profile, however timing and prior VCE can further optimize this. Clinical decisions and follow up should be made based around existing risk stratification tools and scores. Further prospective research is needed to determine optimal timing of DAE from presentation of OGIB that would increase diagnostic and therapeutic yields. Figure 1. A and B) Endoscopic images of small bowel vascular lesion. C) Bleeding vascular lesion treated with hemostatic clips. Funding Agencies None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,009 | 0,009 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».