MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4392007533 · doi:10.5406/15351882.137.543.14

Dictionary of Authentic American Proverbs

2024· article· en· W4392007533 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erik Aasland

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of American Folklore · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueLexicography and Language Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLinguisticsArtLiteratureHistoryPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Dictionary of Authentic American Proverbs is the culmination of 50 years of Wolfgang Mieder's proverb scholarship. He has published numerous works on proverbs in North America, but previous works did not draw a distinction between American (US) and British proverbs in use in North America. In the case of this dictionary, Mieder follows scholarly principles in tracking down first occurrences of proverbs that were coined in North America (and in a few cases, Canada, p. 4) from the seventeenth to the twenty-first century.The nearly 40-page introduction covers topics of the origin of proverbs in North America, loan proverbs of North American origin, obvious American (US) proverbs, structure and variants, and anti-proverbs, as well as themes and American (US) values. It is a tour de force of Mieder's proverb research acumen.With any inquiry into authenticity, the question arises about how those not meeting the cut are classified. What does it mean for the proverbs that Mieder evaluates to be found to be “inauthentic”? Are they designated as “fakelore”? No, in most cases, those that did not make the cut did so because of a different origin. As noted earlier, there are numerous proverbs of British origin in use in North America.Mieder does not dwell on the details of the scientific approaches he has taken to bring together this collection of proverbs. He started years ago with LexisNexis full-text searches and expanded into other resources, thereby taking the discipline of proverb research far beyond what Archer Taylor had envisioned in terms of proverb research excellence. The result is this superb collection, which demonstrates the wealth of proverbial riches predominantly from the United States.Even with the wealth of these proverbs, Mieder is reticent to make sweeping generalizations about an American or national character from the collection of US proverbs. For one thing, his collection of proverbs does not contain enough data to make such generalizations. Moreover, the proverbs were coined over the course of centuries, which also limits the ability to make sweeping statements. Still, Mieder does point out some of the most significant themes and tendencies from the collection.One topic I would have liked Mieder to unpack a bit more is the idea of a paremiological minimum for American proverbs, that is, the idea that a researcher may suggest a basic set of proverbs for those learning English as a foreign language to gain a degree of cultural competency. I believe it would have fit well with this proverb collection.The dictionary organizes the proverbs alphabetically by a keyword, which it indicates through the use of bold font. This may or may not be the first word in the proverb. For example: “There is no friend like a dollar” (p. 74). Each entry includes the year of first occurrence and often provides a brief explanatory note.The Dictionary of Authentic American Proverbs will be of interest to folklorists, anthropologists, linguists, and literary scholars. Language used in the preface is easily accessible for the general public, and the topic would be of interest to a broader readership. The lists are also easy to understand and should serve as a ready resource to the wealth of authentic American (US) proverbs.My own proverb research focuses on proverb use in Kazakhstan, a society with an emphasis in maintaining its rich oral traditions. In contrast, I often have conversations with fellow US citizens who find it challenging to call to mind English proverbs. Mieder's collection of 1,500 proverbs from the United States, as well as his section discussing loan proverbs from English, is a welcome corrective. I will keep this book handy to show off the wealth of proverbs from the United States.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,759
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,451

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,244
Écart entre enseignants0,233 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of American FolkloreMême sujetLexicography and Language StudiesTravaux en français237 207